01-11-2009, 02:38 AM
EXACTLY esnap!! but according to glen you must belong to the pacific legal foundation if you dont agree with him[
]
i read in the star bulletin that they were thinking it could add up to 20K in cost to a new home. i dont oppose solar, in fact, we have used solar for over 30 years in different applications. i oppose forcing people to do this. not all homes will benefit for example those in the forest under tree cover. or people that are very small users of helco, will never get their money back. i also think as a home builder you should be able to do your own plumbing/electric/solar and let the building inspector pass or fail you. you can get shoddy work from someone licensed just as easily as a talented homeowner....
]i read in the star bulletin that they were thinking it could add up to 20K in cost to a new home. i dont oppose solar, in fact, we have used solar for over 30 years in different applications. i oppose forcing people to do this. not all homes will benefit for example those in the forest under tree cover. or people that are very small users of helco, will never get their money back. i also think as a home builder you should be able to do your own plumbing/electric/solar and let the building inspector pass or fail you. you can get shoddy work from someone licensed just as easily as a talented homeowner....