01-13-2009, 09:15 AM
From way back in the fuzzies of my brain, & from the midwest.... I also thought that part of the adverse possession 'open & notorious' was that all fees (taxes & such) were paid by the the person that is trying to take ownership, not by the landowner of record for the prescribed time....
Again if my memory on that is true... & the landowner of record is still paying the taxes & fees, then no adverse possession claim can be made... but this is digging into the dusty, unused files of an overworked brain, and could be just a figment....
Do any of our legal experts have a more informed read on this?
Again if my memory on that is true... & the landowner of record is still paying the taxes & fees, then no adverse possession claim can be made... but this is digging into the dusty, unused files of an overworked brain, and could be just a figment....
Do any of our legal experts have a more informed read on this?