Marijuana Laws Are Discriminatory

[oink]

quote:

---

If you truly had experience in this area you would not be posting this.

---

Trust me, I do. Or don't trust me, it's ok.

quote:

---

Unfortunatley your wrong, It's called a (CBC) Complete Blood Check.

---

It's a cost issue. You may get that for medical blood but not normally for that sent out for criminal testing, due to budget issues. Hospitals check everything due to liability if they miss something and they charge it to you and I. Medical blood has to be subpoened, and will be if there is a legal reason to do so.

quote:

---

I'm not talking about "Field Sobriety Test". That has no relevence to my post.

---

Why aren't you talking about FSTs. Unless the suspected offender is hospitalized that is the method usually used to tetermine the future course of the investigation.

quote:

---

Maybe in the teenage years and thats a maybe, but in general you're just throwing out opinions.

---

Not just chronological teenage years. Mental teenage years might be accurate.

quote:

---

Actually it's called the three strikes law and there are many people in jail for possesion of pot.

---

Ok, if you don't learn the first two times you have some learning issues. Strike three. I believe that for that to kick in there are some felonies in there somewhere. That law isn't universal. Most places you earn points or some such and if you earn enough points to get a long term, it was your choice.

quote:

---

First of all, factually I'm right. Second, I have no use for either drugs or alchohol therefore I'm unbiased. Third, and most important, I'm a constitutionalist (or quickly becoming one)being such I have watched many of mine and your constitutional rights being trampled on.

---

Because you or someone whos opinion you admire deems something a fact doesn't make it so to anyone other than you. Research and especially Stats can be made to show what you want. I think you will find both research and Stats that bolster both sides of the argument.

Not being a user obviously doesn't make you unbiased. You sure come accross as having a very biased opinion. Of course you are the sole purveyor of facts so there's no reason to listen to other opinions.

I'm sorry, but there is no constitutional right to consume drugs.

You are correct in that there isn't much point in continuing a discussion with you on this topic, other than for the entertainment value.

Pua`a
S. FL
Big Islander to be.