03-20-2009, 10:20 AM
Obviously less cats. The issue I contend with is that TNR is effective. I reject that notion. It's a non-theoretical pain in the butt for me. Others disagree with its effectiveness.
These links may inform the debate. At the very least TNR is questionable in its science. It is unquestionably expensive.
At the very least read this link:
http://www.tnrrealitycheck.com/
These are good as well.
http://feral.typepad.com/feral_thoughts/...r-and.html
[url]
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122216162/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0[/url]
This is an especially comprehensive link, and deals specifically with the failure of TNR in Hawaii, and the cost of this failure.
[url]
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=icwdmother[/url]
I have made every effort to provide credible data. Much much more exists.
These links may inform the debate. At the very least TNR is questionable in its science. It is unquestionably expensive.
At the very least read this link:
http://www.tnrrealitycheck.com/
These are good as well.
http://feral.typepad.com/feral_thoughts/...r-and.html
[url]
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122216162/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0[/url]
This is an especially comprehensive link, and deals specifically with the failure of TNR in Hawaii, and the cost of this failure.
[url]
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=icwdmother[/url]
I have made every effort to provide credible data. Much much more exists.