Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Censorship proposed
#3
I voted no on the road paving because I was sure that what has happened would happen.

This 'censorship' should be clearly limited to marking opinions as opinions and not preventing the inclusion of dissenting voices. As an owner for nearly 20 years, this takes me back to the bad old days of lawsuits and a court appointed overseer. I hoped we were past that.

This paving boondoggle looks fishy overall to me.

Allen
Baton Rouge, LA & HPP
Allen
Finally in HPP
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Censorship proposed - by rodrikthompson - 08-04-2009, 05:21 AM
RE: Censorship proposed - by csgray - 08-04-2009, 05:36 AM
RE: Censorship proposed - by allensylves - 08-04-2009, 07:28 AM
RE: Censorship proposed - by Kelena - 08-04-2009, 07:29 AM
RE: Censorship proposed - by Sean - 08-04-2009, 03:54 PM
RE: Censorship proposed - by Kahunascott - 08-04-2009, 04:15 PM
RE: Censorship proposed - by JerryCarr - 08-04-2009, 05:02 PM
RE: Censorship proposed - by riceflower - 08-05-2009, 05:56 AM
RE: Censorship proposed - by Kelena - 08-05-2009, 06:34 AM
RE: Censorship proposed - by Dave Smith - 08-05-2009, 08:48 AM
RE: Censorship proposed - by riceflower - 08-05-2009, 11:39 AM
RE: Censorship proposed - by Kelena - 08-05-2009, 12:00 PM
RE: Censorship proposed - by riceflower - 08-05-2009, 12:26 PM
RE: Censorship proposed - by Chunkster - 08-05-2009, 01:21 PM
RE: Censorship proposed - by Devany - 08-05-2009, 01:40 PM
RE: Censorship proposed - by Kelena - 08-05-2009, 02:45 PM
RE: Censorship proposed - by jade - 08-06-2009, 03:40 AM
RE: Censorship proposed - by Chunkster - 08-06-2009, 04:35 AM
RE: Censorship proposed - by Kelena - 08-06-2009, 05:00 AM
RE: Censorship proposed - by Punatick - 08-06-2009, 09:25 AM
RE: Censorship proposed - by Rob Tucker - 08-06-2009, 09:30 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)