10-18-2009, 08:21 AM
I see someone is going to sue over the adverse impact the furlough days will have on special needs students. This is a good thing, my question, however is why is the lawsuit only appropriate for special needs students. Is this stupid idea of Lingles only affecting special needs students and not the thousands of other students? The thing that gets under my skin about all of this, is that a lawsuit is only filed for a special class of students and not all the students. We are becoming a nation where if you are not part of a special class, you have no rights. Before 40 people jump on me, I'm not questioning the rights of special needs students to get an equal education and access to the "benefits" of a public education, I'm only questioning the fact that a lawsuit was not filed on behalf of All the students affected.
And as far as not being able to put the furlough days at the end of the year because of a requirement to work so many days a month, that is an administrative function and could be addressed if Lingle and the Union could work together on it. Fat chance of that!!
dick wilson
"Nothing is idiot proof,because idiots are so ingenious!"
And as far as not being able to put the furlough days at the end of the year because of a requirement to work so many days a month, that is an administrative function and could be addressed if Lingle and the Union could work together on it. Fat chance of that!!
dick wilson
"Nothing is idiot proof,because idiots are so ingenious!"
dick wilson
"Nothing is idiot proof,because idiots are so ingenious!"
"Nothing is idiot proof,because idiots are so ingenious!"