12-12-2009, 04:36 AM
This arguement is the government loving one, This is the argument that without the government nothing would ever happen, you mention all the benifits of a federal government, some of them are not even federal, (i.e. fire dept, unless of course you are aware that infact they are all funded by FEMA)
If the Feds didnt exist people would still want to build roads, people would still want to fly in planes, etc
The government didnt invent any of this, they just hold the monolpoly of force, and implementation.
I love people that argue the good of the federal government by saying all the things they "do" when in fact all of this and LIFE would go on (likely better imho) without them than with them.
Arguing govt mandadated vaccines are good because oh look at the roads they pave for you..
Also in reality, the Interstate Highway system is EXTREMELY DANGEROUS and is quite hazardous to drive on and is one of the best ways to die unnaturally, Likely that logic will fall on def ears.
Question: IF everyone is already vaccinated, why would you care if you were mingling with non-vaccinated people? I mean wouldnt your super shot keep you from getting the disease? or do you not fully trust the shot? or there is no actual real measurable efficacy of "flu shots"
If the Feds didnt exist people would still want to build roads, people would still want to fly in planes, etc
The government didnt invent any of this, they just hold the monolpoly of force, and implementation.
I love people that argue the good of the federal government by saying all the things they "do" when in fact all of this and LIFE would go on (likely better imho) without them than with them.
Arguing govt mandadated vaccines are good because oh look at the roads they pave for you..
Also in reality, the Interstate Highway system is EXTREMELY DANGEROUS and is quite hazardous to drive on and is one of the best ways to die unnaturally, Likely that logic will fall on def ears.
Question: IF everyone is already vaccinated, why would you care if you were mingling with non-vaccinated people? I mean wouldnt your super shot keep you from getting the disease? or do you not fully trust the shot? or there is no actual real measurable efficacy of "flu shots"
quote:
Originally posted by BigIslandPapa
There are provisions in the Federal Government, and many State Governments for mandatory vaccinations for communicable diseases that are considered a danger to the community as a whole. But there are provisions for people to not take a vaccine, but be quarantined. This is not a nefarious act by the Federal, State, or County Governments to control the population by killing them with poison vaccines...or any other manner. The reasons for such adamant discussion on this issue is that most of the people (not all) who argue against vaccinations also have an extreme distrust or hatred for the Federal Government. Forget all of the benefits that everyone has that stems from the Federal Government...Firefighters...Law Enforcement...Paved Roads...Airports...Air Traffic Controllers...Federal Aviation Safety...Federal Employment...Military protection...etc. But hey they are the Federal Government...oh wait! Isn't the Federal Government responsible for Social Security (Disability)...Medicare...will people give that up with vaccines because they are from the Federal Government too?
Here is that link: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/RS21414.pdf
Mahalo
Terry
Aloha & Mahalo
Terry