01-07-2010, 08:43 AM
This is where you and i differ
http://www.infoshop.org/faq/secF2.html#secf22
There is a freedom allowed in selling oneself, it is a choice or not.
I see the contradiction that is trying be made but, based on other fundamentals I disagree.
IMHO operations outside the family unit are different than inside and for a good purpose. and yet inside the house there is an authoritarianism. I sure dont want people looking at me the way I look at one of my kids. Do you see the difference?
I am not trying to peg you in a hole i am trying to look for some sort of reference, i am glad you are clear on social darwinism. That you are linking me to the infoshop.org view on anarchism OK. you see we will get the thread shut if I ask you to get into the more specific details of your views, i am familiar with infoshop.org
well i am sure the slashing will begin, but for more predictions for the puna district
1. i predict the new pahoa longs will have a hard time keeping itself nice inside
2. the spot where punatic cafe was will stay empty
http://www.infoshop.org/faq/secF2.html#secf22
There is a freedom allowed in selling oneself, it is a choice or not.
I see the contradiction that is trying be made but, based on other fundamentals I disagree.
IMHO operations outside the family unit are different than inside and for a good purpose. and yet inside the house there is an authoritarianism. I sure dont want people looking at me the way I look at one of my kids. Do you see the difference?
I am not trying to peg you in a hole i am trying to look for some sort of reference, i am glad you are clear on social darwinism. That you are linking me to the infoshop.org view on anarchism OK. you see we will get the thread shut if I ask you to get into the more specific details of your views, i am familiar with infoshop.org
well i am sure the slashing will begin, but for more predictions for the puna district
1. i predict the new pahoa longs will have a hard time keeping itself nice inside
2. the spot where punatic cafe was will stay empty
quote:
Originally posted by chrisb483
"the problem with this is what if the cook does not want to give it away freely? Is this cook somehow an inherently different type of human than we have been throughout history? has social darwinism had its way with him and he is not the product of tons of future social evolution? If he is different because he has been "freed" from his brainwashing burdens, how did that occur? hash this out for me please."
You are still thinking like a capitalist and that is the problem. People would do what they want. No one is telling him to make hamburgers. But his contribution, if it is valuable to society will be understood naturally. No committees, no profit charts needed. Why would a man contribute by making hamburgers if no one wanted them.
Did your mother make you food and then charge you for it? In fact, the family is the most anarchist system we have functioning today. There was a need and she filled it. There is no need money in the house, why do you think this should not be a fractal of society.
I do not believe in social darwinism. It is a fallacy that brought hitler to power. And I do not agree with most if the zeitgeist movement. Stop trying to peg me in your own hole. I told you I advocate anarchism. If you want to know fully what that means I would suggest reading all of this.
http://www.infoshop.org/faq/index.html
Look at the further comments in this thread, it is all about social pressure and control. You do not seem to mind this very much, yeah? Stay on topic! Don't deviate or they will shut you down and KILL the thread!