10-11-2012, 07:42 AM
Are you anti-GM activists just a *little* worried of being on the same side as this ^ person?
Fight for Non-GMO Foods and Proper GMO Labeling
|
10-11-2012, 07:42 AM
Are you anti-GM activists just a *little* worried of being on the same side as this ^ person?
10-11-2012, 08:36 AM
Nope! Ethyl, git this ^ person a beer!
"An idea whose time has come cannot be stopped" Dr. Ron Paul 2012
SECRET KNOWLEDGE - "NOT FOR US TO KNOW"? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91qs9v-upWI
10-11-2012, 09:33 AM
That's a pretty good list. Think LIBOR, which is a really great name for it. As an aside, here's a new solar system set to be released to the public. Twenty times more solar mojo, according to the press.
http://hangthebankers.com/spin-cell-gene...nel-solar/ quote: Lee Eisenstein http://members.cruzio.com/~lionel/event "Be kinder than necessary, as everyone you meet is engaged in some kind of strudel."
Lee Eisenstein
http://members.cruzio.com/~lionel/event "Be kinder than necessary, as everyone you meet is engaged in some kind of strudel."
10-11-2012, 09:50 AM
I see that the most popular post on that 'hangthebankers' website is about Bill Gates admitting to chemtrails! Stop the press.
Nevertheless, it sounds like a good idea, I hope it works out despite all the moving parts. Not sure how it relates to GM.
10-11-2012, 01:41 PM
Why does this issue have to be such a problem, If there is nothing to hide just label it and let us make the decision about the food we buy.
http://justlabelit.org/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/04...36598.html http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2...o-labeling
10-11-2012, 02:01 PM
Here we go again. What if someone stands up tomorrow and says any food harvested on Sundays is cursed and that should be on the label too?
Do we do that as well? Putting warnings on labels should only happen when there is actually something to warn for, otherwise people won't read labels. You have to draw the line somewhere and that line is scientific proof.
10-11-2012, 02:41 PM
Labeling the food GMO, is not a warning label it is informing me of how it was grown so I can make a decision about buying that product. I have already changed my shopping habits, not because of this issue, but because of how tasteless the food has become.
BUY LOCAL!
10-11-2012, 02:49 PM
Warnings are put on things like cigarettes that have proven risk. The big tobacco companies fought for years, including hiding the science, to keep warning labels off cigarettes.
Many things are IDENTIFIED on products, which is not the same as a warning label: calcium enriched, sugar free, high fructose corn syrup (HFS or HFCS) free, folic acid enriched, BGH free, grass fed, vitamin C enriched, artificial flavor free, artificial color free,and on and on. Plus ingredient lists that include preservatives that have been cleared for human consumption but are always listed on food boxes. Asking for food to be identified is not the same as asking for a "warning label" you are using apples to talk about oranges. Consumers have a right to know what they put into their, and their children's, bodies on a daily basis. Not everyone is in a position to only eat food from a natural food store, the people who care about their family's health shouldn't have to pay extra to know what they feed their family. Carol
Carol
Every time you feel yourself getting pulled into other people's nonsense, repeat these words: Not my circus, not my monkeys. Polish Proverb
10-11-2012, 03:09 PM
I really don't like having to pull those little stickers off apples. Bet I can just eat them and nothing will happen.
10-11-2012, 03:18 PM
Carol, it is you who is comparing the apple with the proverbial orange. What these anti-GM activists want are federally mandated warning labels for anything containing GM. That is not the same as a producer *choosing* to put "sugar free" on their product.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|