My two cents:
I fully understand the problem that residents have with the sound that this particular tree frog species emits at night. I experienced it years ago while doing research on other indigenous endangered species (Puerto Rican Parrot) in Puerto Rico. I have also spent nights on my land in Puna so I have first hand knowledge of the issue. It is curious to note that in PR the Coqui have not completely over run the island and decimated or displaced all other creatures (birds, amphibians, insects, etc) in the ecosystem. So why is it our expectation that all of these negative outcomes will occur in Hawaii?
Please forgive me for trying to impart logic to quantify the perceived threat, but over and above the sound (nighttime vocalizations) I think it is a real stretch.
We as a nation have gotten used to having threats fabricated to get us to vote certain ways and to stimulate citizen based actions in support of “Special Interest Group” initiatives. I for one do not like being manipulated and would prefer to work collectively with my neighbors and community to solve problems constructively.
The proponents of this particular campaign have much to gain monetarily from a designation of the Coqui as an “Invasive Species”. Bear in mind that once such a designation is ratified, the Federal and State funding streams start which are then used to fill the “Slush Funds” of the respective officials. Those officials then on a cyclical basis continue to go through the motions (loaning out sprayers) of eradicating the problem with no real intention of solving the problem because if they do, the money source dries up.
It also reminds me of a similar “Fear Campaign” waged in my home state of Maryland a couple of years ago. Seems that someone released one or several Asian snakehead fish in a local lake. The fish propagated over a couple year period and when an angler caught the first adult fish, the hysteria started. The pond was poisoned, all fish and other life in the pond were killed. Not being satisfied, the local authorities then completely drained the pond to be sure that NOTHING was left! Well they succeeded, it has been almost four years and that pond is still a sterile wasteland. It took eons for that ponds ecosystem to evolve to the healthy state that it was in before all of the human intervention to protect us began. I might also add that the pond was on private property and the State completely ignored the owners property rights, trespassed and took the actions above. BTW, on a national basis the snakehead of which there are numerous sub-species has been identified in many states and is obviously here to stay.
Nothing is indigenous or native to Hawaii, get over it! Everything (plants, animals, birds, fungi, bacteria, etc) ALL have been introduced over time. That fact that certain unique species have evolved as a result of “Natural Selection” that are now considered “Native Hawiian Species” should not be a surprise to anyone except those that are proponents of “Intelligent Design”. The process is called evolution. Hawaii like the rest of our known universe is and will remain in a constant state of evolution or change.
I offer the following: The term invasive species refers to a subset of those species defined as introduced species or non-indigenous species. Invasive species can alter ecological relationships among native species and can affect ecosystem function, economic value of ecosystems, and human health. A species is regarded as invasive if it has been introduced by human action to a location, area, or region where it did not previously occur naturally (i.e., is not native), becomes capable of establishing a breeding population in the new location without further intervention by humans, and spreads widely throughout the new location. Natural range extensions are common in many species, but the rate and magnitude of human-mediated extensions in these species tend to be much larger than natural extensions, and the distances that species can travel to colonize are also often much greater with human agency (Cassey et al. 2005). The majority of introduced species do not cause significant ecological change or environmental harm because they exist primarily in habitats already subjected to intensive human alteration; such species may not be considered 'invasive'. Looks like we need to own up to the fact they we ourselves are the most threatening invasive species and in our normal daily activities we completely ignore the majority of our responsibilities as stewards of the land.
Now on to something constructive so that folks that are really having a problem can collectively take action and feel that they are having a positive impact on their quality of life. The current manual (Band-Aid) approaches that are being suggested/employed such as hand spraying various chemicals into the environment will have a much more negative impact on the ecosystem and environment of Hawaii than the Coqui individually. Further these small scale attempts will never eliminate the problem. I would like to suggest that we as a community ask our State and Local representatives to support research and efforts to address the entire problem scientifically. What I am referring to is biological
http://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/coqui/bio_control.asp and genetic
http://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/coqui/genetic_control.asp control approaches. These two approaches, once validated, if implemented concurrently and in a systematic fashion hold the most promise for a viable long term solution. I ask you all to arm yourself with knowledge so we can collectively make informed decisions about how best to manage this issue and to preserve the land, environment, and place (Hawaii) that we all love so much. We can achieve the best possible optimal solution if we remove our emotions from the equation and work together.
Mahalo,
Will Peratino