Would it be a legal practice to ask people to pay x amount for an application process that was never intended to be a fair process or was already decided?
If the state of hawaii had already visited and pre-chosen team Ha's to be our islands 1st dispensary owner then why continue to take others application money without a fair application approval process?
Didn't the recent geothermals talk of expansion of another puna geothermal plant process also have questions surrounding its application or rewarding process?
http://westhawaiitoday.com/news/local-ne...investment
http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/ArticlesM...mpany.aspx
Interesting to find Mr HA's name in this controversial geothermal investment too,jmo.
Why does it feel like (OHA) is only out for the money?
What is the difference between IDG and OHA?
It always stinks like there is some kind of unfair or unethical process happening with the way this county, state, and oha discuss, propose, or deal with future geothermal interests or intentions here in lower Puna.
Would including the general public or the community that lives around the geothermal power plant be to much to ask?
Also found this recent article that helps explain some of the decades old civil forfeiture laws that have been impacting or hurting many Puna residents.
http://westhawaiitoday.com/news/local-ne...rty-ransom
Why can this state run a civil forfeiture program aimed at displacing local families from their property, faster than the county or state can run a geothermal relocation program to help a concerned family relocate?
Edited to add links.