quote:
Originally posted by HereOnThePrimalEdge
[i]...a legitimate question dismissed with “fake news” ...
Even if she has no control over foreign operatives (if they exist) the question for me remains, if they are real, why would they support her candidacy?
legitimate question?
-------------------------
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: You said we have to end the new Cold War and you have taken a notably softer line on Vladimir Putin and Russia than some other Democrats and Republicans, want to put up a headline from the Daily Beast this week that said "Tulsi Gabbard’s campaign is being boosted by Putin apologists." And, you know, in the past, you met with Assad, you defended Russian military operations in Syria, you opposed the arrest of Julian Assange, suggested that Russian election meddling is no worse than America’s historically.
Do you believe that Vladimir Putin is a threat to U.S. national security?
REP. TULSI GABBARD: You know, it’s unfortunate that you’re citing that article, George, because it’s a whole lot of fake news. What I am focused on is...
------------------------
1 - not a legitimate question considering the preamble he gave. Is she supposed to ignore the entire introduction?
2 - she answers what appears to be the larger question.