Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Campaign ethics
#81
snorkle quote
"Tiffany and others have replied; but what's strange is who hasn't replied(RJ)."

RJ would not even dignify her paper by responding. Let me tell you what happened. Alan Mc Narie called us by accident about 2 weeks ago. Alan thought he was calling tiffany and he said "Mrs. Hunt your surveys." He used the plural. I wish I had pretended I was Tiffany to hear what he was going to say next. But instead I told him "This is Sativa. You called the wrong number." Then Alan said that he called us by mistake because RJ's number is right below Tiffany's. I asked him what he meant by "your survey's" (plural)? Alan could barely finish his lie. He was shuddering like I have never heard Alan stutter before he is usually clear and concise. Also, it was already a week and half into July when he called almost 3 weeks after having the supposed deadline in June. Not very good for a journalist. It is a lie that Tiffany is not involved in this questionnaire. That is just one of the games she is playing. There is something happening here. What it is ain't exactly clear. And as far as people voting for RJ don't worry about it snorkle you just keep hating!

snorkle quote "Maybe you guys don't read the BIC (Oh wait, you obviously do)."

I can not get on the BIC. I have removed all my cookies, including my Oreo's and vanilla wafers and still I cannot get on BIC to respond. My friends have to call me and send me the BIC posts. I will tell you why I know I am blocked. I had an internet man who works for the State on computers try to trouble shoot as to why I was not able to get on to BIC. He cleaned my cookies like I said and then he tried and could not get into BIC. A mutual friend called Tiffany about 3 months ago and told her that we could not get on to BIC. Then we got an email from Tiffany telling us to try again . And low and behold, because of who the mutual friend is, Tiffany let me back on for 3 post before blocking me again for NO reason. My last post on BIC was to Mark Hinshaw about SB2274.

What can I expect from Tiffany who is from Wyoming. That state is 50th in the country for their lack of morals and ethics! And that is what you want to defend snorkle? A Wyoming gal with no Aloha whose father was a bomber pilot. Mr Edward's had to kill a lot of people to get his strips. An tiffany's stood in the sun so long she is blind to everything else but herself. Tiffany is playing silly games because she is a juvenile candidate. No one is using the tactics that her and her team are using.

So go ahead snorkle and do your worst.


Reply
#82
quote:
Originally posted by Anxious Messiah

YouTube will not remove a video in a public forum, especially a pubic meeting where the speakers are voluntarily speaking and know they are being recorded. But by all means, knock yourself out and request it.

_________________________________________
Don't speak unless you can improve on the silence.


I have requested removal of such videos and said requests have been honored. So stick that in your pipe and smolder with it.
Reply
#83
And another thing while I am at it, snorkle why don't you try coming out from behind your user name and say these things publicly in your own name. Easy to criticize or jump to conclusions (maybe the only excise you get) when your snipping from behind your user name. snorkle you're a COWARD! Everything I write I say with my name behind it. Everything is a matter of public record when it comes to politics.


When people are honest and sincere all politics will disappear.
Reply
#84
Participation on Punaweb does not require that members use real names. I have no way, if I wanted to, to confirm real names.

Those who choose to use their real names, like I do, are welcome to or they can use most any username they want.


Assume the best and ask questions.

Punaweb moderator
Assume the best and ask questions.

Punaweb moderator
Reply
#85
Do you mean to tell me that Tiffany is originally from Wyoming, and her father is a combat veteran? (Well, that's certainly relevant. Are you one of the people who spit on us when we returned from VietNam?)

So you're born and raised here? Has any of your family served their country?

Sorry, but along with 90% of the contributors here, I will continue to with my user name. Does that make ALL of us cowards? or only the ones who disagree with you?
(Seems like a dangerous tactic for someone soliciting votes)
Reply
#86
Sativa,
I stated earlier how it may be more effective for you to garner votes by remaining silent. The above is another example.

You seem to feel that people who've served in combat are killers, and that people who have user names are cowards. It doesn't really bother me much, as I'm familiar with the source.

But;

1. What do you think the demographics are, here on punaweb, of user names and people with loved one's who've served their country?

and;

2.How exactly, is insulting them going to get you support?

Sometimes silence IS golden.
Reply
#87
When people are honest and sincere all politics will disappear.

How about you go first, in a show of good faith?
Reply
#88
Sativa, the call to Tiffany was to remind her to return her own survey, which she hadn't filled out at that point. Tiffany had no input in the creation of the survey, and didn't see it before the other candidates. I probably was confused by your reference to "surveys" in the plural, as I don't believe I said that. And a matter of fact, as many people who have talked to me can attest, I do stutter. As to the deadlines--yes, I wanted to make sure we got voters as much information as possible about all the candidates, so I was still calling candidates, urging them to get their questionnaire responses in, until the very last minute before going to print. In fact, RJ got requests for her answers well after that call to Tiffany, and when she declined to respond, I still included her by finding online statements she'd made about her positions. I don't think that you'll find anything negative or untruthful in what we printed about her. I'm sorry if that wrong-number phone call confused you, but I really did make every effort to provide voters with fair coverage of all the candidates. After all, it was my reputation on the line, too.

Alan D. McNarie
Alan D. McNarie
Reply
#89
Alan, re my post on prior page, the formatting used for Tiffany's response and Karen Eoff's is much more readable. Is there a reason that the other responses don't have a contrasting font (bold) to separate questions and responses?
Is there a reason why only Tiffany has a photo (and a color photo) on her submission? Were others told they could provide photos?

As an editor, I'm sure you are aware that what stands out to the eye has a better chance of getting read when there is an overwhelming amount of competing material.
It also seems like they should all be tagged the same other than the candidate's name. I tried finding them with a sort by tag, and they didn't all come up.

I am not questioning your ethics, but the entries are in fact different in impact due to formatting and photo inclusion (or not), and I think it would be much better if there were a uniform format.
Reply
#90
Alan McNarie quote:
"In fact, RJ got requests for her answers well after that call to Tiffany, and when she declined to respond, I still included her by finding online statements she'd made about her positions."

Alan, isn't that something. RJ sent you a photo of herself and a statement that said you could use her photo and you could tell the readers that she declined to participate in the BIC survey or whatever it was. The reason she did not want to participate, which is her right, is because you insisted on editing her responses.

P.S. Alan welcome to the punaweb.."Nice to meet ya" said the spider to the fly. Yes, I doubt your veracity as far as this election project that you are doing with Mrs. Hunt. I don't care how much you scream 'it's fair'. And I am entitled to my doubts and my viewpoints especially when it comes to Tiffany Edwards Hunt. And now that KathyH brings up the layout that looks like a deliberate attempt to allow certain things to stand out and certain things to recede. It's all mind control crap. That is why RJ did not want to play.

When people are honest and sincere all politics will disappear.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)