Posts: 218
Threads: 10
Joined: Dec 2005
"NO ONE gets terminated for nothing."
Wanting to take total control of the Association (policy and management) is a valid conjecture for a reason, especially as they still haven't relinquished that control six months later...and have caused the entire hiring process to have to be repeated from the beginning.
Posts: 85
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2014
quote:
Originally posted by janet
and have caused the entire hiring process to have to be repeated from the beginning.
This is NOT true. Check your facts.
Karma
Karma
Posts: 1,217
Threads: 18
Joined: Jan 2014
That's what we need - PunaFactCheck.org
Posts: 46
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2014
Mermaid - I worked with you in the past right? Our relationship was friendly, professional and courteous wasn't it? So you can understand when I say that I'm shocked and confused with some of your posts. You think I was given fair treatment .........really? just wanted you to think about it.
Your Quote: NO ONE gets terminated for nothing. This issue is more complicated than most understand and some are terribly misinformed. If anyone wants the truth, find out what happened during the previous mgmt's tenure. Go digging, get the whole picture, get your own truth. Read previous minutes. One person doesn't want anyone to talk about the past, but you're not informed otherwise.
How would you know? You're putting yourself out here as a competent authority on this matter. The past minutes tell folks nothing that relates to a reason for our unlawful and immoral terminations.
I think your a nice person but I think it's a disservice to all involved.
Cathy Fincher
Posts: 218
Threads: 10
Joined: Dec 2005
A partial repeat of my post of 1/24/2015
"Finally we're getting a checks and balances w/the brand new HRC. The other 3 resigned recently, coincidentally after a lot owner and former HRC member, questioned the board about the validity of HRC's actions since they had broken bylaws. The newest board members responded to these questions which prompted what occurred at the last board mtg. Someone who attended the mtg told me that all actions by the HRC was voted null and void by the board. If this is true, does that mean any hirings during the previous HRC's tenure is also null and void? (emphasis added)
[Reference to the Board acting correctly under the Bylaws in taking the specified action]
However, if the Board voted to declare all actions by the HRC "null and void", it would include the job descriptions advertised in the HTH. Therefore, the entire process to replace the three fired employees will have to start again from the beginning.
[/u]
From the post immediately below mine"
"My thoughts exactly Janet, it makes sense and it's the right thing to do."
Posts: 1,265
Threads: 10
Joined: Sep 2014
[quote]Originally posted by CatFincher50
Mermaid - I worked with you in the past right? Our relationship was friendly, professional and courteous wasn't it? So you can understand when I say that I'm shocked and confused with some of your posts. You think I was given fair treatment .........really? just wanted you to think about it.
How would you know? You're putting yourself out here as a competent authority on this matter. The past minutes tell folks nothing that relates to a reason for our unlawful and immoral terminations.
I think your a nice person but I think it's a disservice to all involved.
______________________
My relationship w/you for the most part was friendly and courteous. But our relationship has nothing to do w/this.
Actually I know quite a bit Cathy, from my own observations. You're the one who asked how I would know, or whether I had any authority to post what I've posted. You're the one who said there would be nothing in the minutes. Here's my response to that.
You're underestimating what many lot owners have observed first hand over the years. For example, a couple incidents that occurred at gen'l membership mtgs with myself along w/many lot owner witnesses, and then subsequent mtgs w/follow up attempts by a lot owner seeking justice. Maybe it's in those minutes??? It should be and if it isn't...why not? There should also be info in the board mtg minutes as there was follow up by the lot owner and also by a board member. I won't get baited into saying anything more specific. So I believe that gives me authority in what I've posted as it's first hand.
As I stated earlier, I didn't agree w/the method of terminations. Your termination specifically I can't address here since all 3 of you joined together in this lawsuit. I have no ill will towards you and wish you the best Cathy.
Posts: 173
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2014
Always about the messenger and never about the message.
Posts: 14
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2014
I have not posted in sometime but have been entertained at the so called knowledgeable people outside the Park who are posting misinformation. I think it is hilarious that hppwatchdog continues to spew his vomit despite his/her limited knowledge. I would like to see more of what this thread was created for....shockwaverider, what do we have to do to keep the likes from posting on what could otherwise be an informational thread about HPP issues without the name calling and insults?
Posts: 46
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2014
Mermaid - for the most part.......OK,
I was at many of these meetings you are referring to and am well aware of the goings on, are you trying to allude my attention to something specific??
There is no greater harm than that of time wasted!
It's a beautiful day !
Posts: 175
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2014
After 6 months, no financial discrepancies have been found. After 6 months, there is no police record or investigation of missing equipment. After 6 months, they did not unearth any bookkeeping errors or payoffs or kickbacks. After 6 months they have not disclosed any wrong doings of the former employees. The roads were better, the office was run professionally, financial reports and meetings were monthly, anytime we had a question there was someone to answer it, money was not being wasted on attorneys, there was no lawsuits. There were just a small handful of people who didn't like the employees for invalid reasons. Their dislike was personal and emotional not logical. Their reasons have all been proven invalid repeatedly and dishonest. We were far better off a year ago. Now we know nothing, have no clue of our finances and aren't allowed to know with this regime. I have had jobs where I didn't like my boss or other personnel but it was my job to work with them not throw them out and some of the roughest ones were the best workers and the most knowledgeable. A smart person learns to work with them and learns not tear the whole thing apart because it suits them. This board has torn apart this neighborhood for their own agenda. It has nothing to do with what is best for everyone.
