09-06-2006, 11:20 AM
I was doing a little research and playing around on my computer at the Hawaii property tax website, when I was able to locate the Shipman property that is adjacent to Hawaiian Paradise Park (the property which fronts the beach which one can hike to from a dead end road in HPP).
Okay, they have 692.855 acres zoned agricultural and 311 acres zoned as conservation and a lot of it is oceanfront. Here's where it pays to be rich: their assessed land value is only $302,600 and their yearly tax is only $2,551.59.
Of course, if you click on map under their tax record 16001003, it says no map is available for this record. But if you pull up an adjacent record in HPP like 15060073, zoom out, and then click on select parcel and click on the Shipman property adjacent to it, it blocks off in yellow where their property is located and gives you their parcel number: 16001003.
Oh, and their 4,305.09 acres above this parcel only has a tax burden of $6,134.75 per year.
Of course, if they don't build on it or develop it, I guess they deserve a tax break for providing everyone with a beach and nice hike.
But if they are planning on developing like earlier posts have mentioned, this just doesn't seem right.
Just my two cents.
Okay, they have 692.855 acres zoned agricultural and 311 acres zoned as conservation and a lot of it is oceanfront. Here's where it pays to be rich: their assessed land value is only $302,600 and their yearly tax is only $2,551.59.
Of course, if you click on map under their tax record 16001003, it says no map is available for this record. But if you pull up an adjacent record in HPP like 15060073, zoom out, and then click on select parcel and click on the Shipman property adjacent to it, it blocks off in yellow where their property is located and gives you their parcel number: 16001003.
Oh, and their 4,305.09 acres above this parcel only has a tax burden of $6,134.75 per year.
Of course, if they don't build on it or develop it, I guess they deserve a tax break for providing everyone with a beach and nice hike.
But if they are planning on developing like earlier posts have mentioned, this just doesn't seem right.
Just my two cents.