Posts: 39
Threads: 3
Joined: Sep 2007
oink, sorry the links aren't working for you.
my take on the lava is...every place has something, BI has lava. I live 'in the Marina District in San Francisco (built on slush over a major fault line)'. I'll just be trading one for another. Gotta see if the + outweigh the - in your own head. and yes, I was here in 1989.
ok, gotta go eat turkey now.
Cheers,
Jen
California/Hawaii
Aloha,
Jen
California/Hawaii
Posts: 798
Threads: 38
Joined: May 2005
Well I look forward to seeing the maps and photos, but it is somewhat of a relief. I think the odds of your home burning from lava while you own it are probably less than being struck by lighting, which is around 1/12,000 if I recall correctly. Moving from Oakland on the overdue Hayward Fault, I think the odds of a catastrophe in my lifetime there are actually lower.
Posts: 6,214
Threads: 354
Joined: Feb 2006
Saw this video posted on the 'other side', there is a short commericial first:
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/tech/20...olcano.cnn
Edited by - carey on 11/24/2007 07:26:35
Posts: 39
Threads: 3
Joined: Sep 2007
Thanx Carey, Great video. and they uptated the map, and cool new photos too.
Cheers,
Jen
California/Hawaii
Aloha,
Jen
California/Hawaii
Posts: 2,980
Threads: 177
Joined: Aug 2006
Amazing video, Carey. A moving picture is worth a few thousand words. It does appear to be moving south, fitfully. Not too much lava is going into the perched channel headed East and the flows have stopped there.
I am going to be optimistic about this (until the real optimists return!).
Posts: 35
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2006
I'm still the optimist Glen. I always thought the flow would go South. I still liked your slant on things, as serious as the situation is. And the flow is now headed South to another subdivision. Still not good for them.
Leif
Posts: 76
Threads: 5
Joined: Jul 2007
As I was saying the other day Pele will decide her path, we must appreciate and respect her choices.
Shane Turpin
Lava Ocean Adventures
Posts: 100
Threads: 14
Joined: Apr 2007
Does anyone know what the white areas mean on the latest flow maps? Would they be areas that are burnt but not lava-covered? THey didn't appear on earlier maps (that I saved) but compared to them, the new lava flows seem to be covering the previous flows and not spreading much further than what was already covered.
Posts: 1,261
Threads: 55
Joined: Nov 2005
Those are older flows that predate the 1983 to present flows. Still too new to have any large forest growth.
Posts: 2,980
Threads: 177
Joined: Aug 2006
HVO reports that she is filling the perched channel again. Sigh.
So, we are going East, seeping North and South, and flowing into a pond south of the fissure.
I was thinking, a tube flow might actually be better than a surface flow....because it is below the surface! Feel free to talk sense into me.
