Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Limiting number of tourists to help environment
#31
Kathy, I'm glad you and you neighbors found a niche industry. I'm for as much diversification as possible, so the inevitable fluctuations in the tourism industry will be cushioned a little. I had relatives in the 70s on Maui that had field jobs in the cut flower industry. But that market is limited due to air freight being a necessity. Besides, I doubt the field jobs paid as well as most tourist industry jobs. What is the pay rate for most of the workers in the live plant industry in which you and your neighbors are involved? Or, are they very small family businesses where management is also the labor?

With continued growth, even at a slower pace, Hilo and Puna are unlikely to remain quaint. I'm sorry for that. I wish it could stay the small quaint town it was. I'm one of those people that piss off many locals because I want to move to the BI and have slow growth (after me and my growth). Sorry, but I'm selfish that way. I'm not for the saddle road improvements, as it will encourage the increased use of the Hilo side as a bedroom community for Kona workers. I think, for many reasons, workers should live near their jobs.

quote:
Arts, science, medicine, education, industry, publishing, computing, real estate (non vacation rental), astronomy, fishing, at least some agriculture, horticulture, construction, services aimed at residents, performing arts for the community and so forth.

Arts: They are generally funded by a population employed by other industries, or the rich.

Science, Medicine, Education & Astronomy: Maybe to some degree. Other than astronomy or oceanography, I don't know that other research centers would want to be as geographically isolated as is Hawaii. It would be nice to see Hawaii's Schools of higher learning become more renown and become a larger draw. Increased outside tuition would also help subsidize the tuition for residents. I still see them as no more than a moderate size employers.

Industry: Other than these others mentioned? If you're talking manufacturing, what is your labor source? Are you going to import guest workers from the Philippines or India so that your labor costs will stay competitive in the world market?

Publishing: This industry is already being outsourced to cheaper labor markets in Asia.

Computing: Same as above. It's going to Asia.

Real Estate (non vacation rental): It will always be here at some level, as someone is always buying or selling. Do you want another artificial boom market fueled by outside investors and speculators? Such markets do result in a large increase in employment in the Real Estate industry. Ask the Johns how many agents have gone inactive in the currently slowing market. In a healthy steady market, there is room for only a limited number of agents. In a normal market, many newly licensed agents learn that lesson quickly.

Fishing: Unless someone can develop an environmentally friendly open ocean aquaculture method, I don't see much chance for an increase in employment in this area. Aren't fishing stocks dwindling?

Agriculture and Horticulture: I think we covered this topic. No one wants to be field labor at field labor wages. These will probably not become big industries, other than the possibility of large mechanized farms growing crops to support a potential biofuel industry. But, to be viable, they will have to be heavily mechanized, without high labor costs, and hopefully pollute less than the sugar industry.

Construction: There will always be some construction industry. I would hope it can become a much smaller industry. Otherwise, it means we are on our way to totally paving paradise.

Services aimed at residents, performing arts for the community and so forth: Yep, I'm all for that, but you have to have a healthy community supported by some other well paying industry.

Of course we can (or is it continue to) build and sell huge projects for retirees to come and die in (me?). This would support Real Estate, Construction large Service Industry and increased Medical Industry. But most of those jobs are relatively low paying except some of the medical jobs, but most medical jobs would be Aids or LPNs and not well paid. I would think it would be better to have tourists that come, drop their money, and leave.


The reality is, with continued growth, the BI is going to lose some or most of it's quaintness. It doesn't have to lose all of it's aloha. I don't see much possibility of other large industries to support the population, other than tourism. Even if some great resource can be found in the sea, Hawaii would have to be unique from other ocean bordering areas to give it some type of market advantage. Hawaii does have the sun, the sea, beautiful vistas, perfect weather, an active volcano, a unique history and aloha. Be kind to the tourist.

End second (or third) rant in one week.

Pua`a
S. FL
Big Islander to be.
Pua`a
S. FL
Big Islander to be.
Reply
#32
David M,

Yes I agree. All unions are bad. Except the one I'm in Smile

Pua`a
S. FL
Big Islander to be.
Pua`a
S. FL
Big Islander to be.
Reply
#33
bottomline, Hawaii is about to burst at the seams, especially Maui(where I grew up), and here on the Big Island too but for different reason. Maui is growing at such an incredible rate. I grew up there when there was only one street light, and it was on the otherside of the island.
Maui's problems are a direct result of not having a good vision for their tourist industry, and having Linda Lingle as Mayor did help anything.
Here on the Big Island the problem isn't so much tourism. The problem as I see it is this big influx or migration if you will of Baby Boomer retirees to the eastside of Hawaii. The vast majority of these new residents have no clue to what's truly going on around here. They move here thinking they have found paradise. Then they try to hold onto that false dream of paradise but going to their graves with the mindset that Hawaii must stay rural. Using their vote, or voice at every turn to stop development. They do this without giving a single thought to the Indigenous people or their traditions. Hence causing a new tide of racial hatred. Right now it's nothing like it use to be, but it's changing quickly.

Personally I could care less about Big Box retailers, here or anywhere. They seem to be a necessary evil in my opinion. So when the Newbies, to put it nicely, move here then try to vote down things like Big Box retailers, etc,etc.. because they think it will ruin there little piece of paradise. I got news for you! No new development can even come close to what you'll experience in the form of anger from the real wards of the Aina, the Hawaiians once they find out their neighbors have voted down some sort of infrastucture that they feel is needed. Yet you feel it will ruin you little spot of paradise.

Let's face it Puna is gonna grow whether or not you like it. Tourism is especially a necessary evil here with so many residents on the welfare Just like expansion is necessary here too! Hawaii is bursting at the seems with new residnets coming almost daily, and if you don't wanna feel the wrath of the Hawaiians, you best except the change. Or get ready to return to the days of hearing, "****ing haoles", and being hated by your neighbors

Handle every situation like a dog,If you can't eat it or hump it,piss on it and walk away...
-----------

Support the 'Jack Herer Initiative'NOW!!
Reply
#34
There is no need to limit tourists to help the enviornment. Everything balances out in the long run. Hawaii has had a good run for a long time. Now its time to lighten the load.

Hawaii is getting way overpriced in the tourist market. Even the japanese tourists who have been our bread and butter for many years are now declining.A hotel room for "one day" in a nice resort hotel is more than the roundtrip airfare. Many mainlanders are having to settle for Florida or Mexico.

The downturn in the national economy is also helping to limit tourists. We are entering a recession. And its bad folks! The president is now seriously considering a stimulus package that includes an $800.00 check for every adult taxpayer in the country that will be mailed out sometime in April if passed.

Watch the superferry news for the next few months. Extremely low ridership is forcing them to close shop and they may be gone permanently by March (I predict).

Hawaii business owners are helping to keep tourists away by the prices they charge. And they may be justified by what they charge....it's just that alot of people now can't afford it.



Reply
#35
Is career military, current and retired sanctioned and protected by the tax payer not a union of sorts, something like socialism? Subsidized jobs like politicians career military certainly have job security don't they? What do I know?

mella l
mella l
Art and Science
bytheSEA
Reply
#36
No need to worry about too many tourists. Hawaii is 2000 miles from anything, and it takes oil to get here. Oil is about $100 per barrel and bound to increase. Jet airplanes use LOTS of jet-A fuel. Hawaii will end up begging for tourists soon enough I wager.
Reply
#37
Uncontrolled growth and tourism destroy the very thing people want when they come to Hawaii.Why does everyone go to Maui now? Because Oahu is turning into Hong Kong. If not for people trying to keep some semblance of sanity in growth there'd be massive housing developments along the hills above Paumalu/Sunset and Sandy Beach already. Now it seems that there's going to be 5 hotels and a ton of condo/timeshares built from Kawela Bay to Malaekahana anyways which will turn the North Shore into a worse mess than it's already become. I remember the battles that had to be fought to keep beach access to Hapuna and the Kona coast when those hotels went up too and that also makes me leary of this unilateral support for the tourist industry. Even now Ko Olina seems to be trying to evade the agreement to provide a public boat ramp as part of the deal that allowed it's construction. Tourism has benefits but also negative impacts that need to be limited not only for tourists benefit but for locals as well.
Reply
#38
Sorry Mella, but out of respect for Rob's rules, I won't even begin to unravel this drivel, except to question its relevance to topic.

David

quote:
Originally posted by mella l

Is career military, current and retired sanctioned and protected by the tax payer not a union of sorts, something like socialism? Subsidized jobs like politicians career military certainly have job security don't they? What do I know?

mella l


Ninole Resident
Ninole Resident
Reply
#39
Reading all this stuff about people moving, visiting and living in Hawaii makes me wonder if all should leave, that way Hawaii would be like it use to be!

Who really has a right to say any of us should have the right to live here and say who cant

Just a thought on the big scheme of things.
[8D]
peace
Reply
#40
David M,
I think your initial statement about unions is right up there in the “Irresponsible” department as any other blanket statement. Such broad stroke of paint often spill in places their not wanted.

David D
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)