01-08-2010, 12:09 PM
Auntie Emily's assistant sent me these two letters from Councilwoman Naeole regarding this issue. It was requested that they be posted here as she wants community involvement.
"The Honorable Linda Lingle
Governor, State of Hawai`i
Executive Chambers
State Capitol
Honolulu, Hawai`i 96813
Aloha Governor Lingle,
Fannie Mae declared in, June of 2009, that it would no longer purchase or securitizes mortgage loans in Big Island Lava 1 & 2 zones. “Properties in lava zone 1 & 2”, according to Fannie Mae, “are not eligible due to the increased risk of property destruction from lava flows within these areas.”
Fannie Mae’s new policy for homeowners and future homeowners in my beloved district of Puna will decrease investment in the community and make it virtually impossible for people to finance or refinance their homes or sell their home. My response to this catastrophic event is that it is more damaging then the threat and risk of lava is the idea that Fannie Mae has changed the rules of the game and not to the benefit of my district.
In saying that, here are some of my thoughts. The LAVA FLOW HAZARD ZONE map of the Big Island was used to make this insurance determination and yet this map was not originally created for risk assessment it was for historical purposes.
Are the people who live at the base of St. Helens redlined, at well? How about the people who live on the San Andres fault? Does Fanny Mae have objections insuring these folks? Does Fanny Mae treat them differently?
This significant policy change will greatly impact the real estate market which is already heading toward a real low. Lava 1 & 2 zones are not just in my district it also includes most of Ka‘u and South Kona too. This decision is going to increase cost of affording housing. How is it that a company can come into our state and dictate who will be covered and who will be left out? If this is true perhaps they should be prohibited to write in the whole state? Insurance is a gamble and it is part of the landscape. Bowing out suddenly and with the flimsiest of excuses is not pono. I am looking to you for answers.
There has to be something we can do to get them to change there decision.
I am looking forward to your response.
Lau Lima,
Emily I. Naeole
Council Member 5th District
County Council Vice-Chair"
"December 10, 2009
The Honorable Jeffrey P. Schmidt
Insurance Commissioner
Insurance Division
P.O. Box 3614
Honolulu, Hawaii
Aloha Commissioner Schmidt,
I have become very concerned about the declining real estate market in my District. It has caused severe economic ramifications and has adversely impacted the availability of low cost housing in the Hilo area.
One of the primary causes for the above conditions is the cost of fire insurance in Lava Zones 1 and 2. Please be aware that over 50% of my district is in Lava Zones 1 and 2 with, 46% of all dwelling in Zones 1 and 2 (4479 units).
I must assume that you are aware; Hawaii Property Insurance Association (HPIA) holds the vast majority of all fire insurance policies in the Lava Zone 1 and 2 areas. With their recent 65% premium increase it has caused a severe economic impact and many times, depletes a family’s disposable income. It has also severely impacted the sales of single family dwellings in the lower Puna District. Because of the high cost of insurance, many people can not qualify for loans with the increased monthly obligation. Also I have determined that it takes 88% longer to sell a house in Zone 1 and 35% longer to sell in Zone 2 then it does to sell in Zone 3. Much of this is due to the excessively high fire insurance costs by having to use HPIA.
As a result of the above, I wish to know why HPIA rates are excessively high. As much as 3 times higher in Zones1 and 2 compared to Zone 3. As an example, for a $250,000 standard policy, the HPIA policy cost is around $2100 while in Zone 3 you can obtain a policy for around $710.
In a recent communication with one of my constituents, Terry Chambers, you mentioned that the HPIA’s rate increase filing is available for public review and that appeals can be made but that a complex actuarial study would be advisable.
I respectfully request that you send me the last 3 years of HPIA filings along with the actuarial studies that I assume you made to justify the increased premiums. If by chance you did not make an actuarial study, I would appreciate that one be made and sent to me or at least send me all the necessary data so we can have the study made for us.
Thank you for your attention to this matter and hopefully we can expect a timely response.
Lau Lima,
Emily I. Naeole-Beason
County Council vice chair.
CC: Gov. Linda Lingle
State Attorney General Mark J. Bennett
Mayor Billy Kenoi"
"The Honorable Linda Lingle
Governor, State of Hawai`i
Executive Chambers
State Capitol
Honolulu, Hawai`i 96813
Aloha Governor Lingle,
Fannie Mae declared in, June of 2009, that it would no longer purchase or securitizes mortgage loans in Big Island Lava 1 & 2 zones. “Properties in lava zone 1 & 2”, according to Fannie Mae, “are not eligible due to the increased risk of property destruction from lava flows within these areas.”
Fannie Mae’s new policy for homeowners and future homeowners in my beloved district of Puna will decrease investment in the community and make it virtually impossible for people to finance or refinance their homes or sell their home. My response to this catastrophic event is that it is more damaging then the threat and risk of lava is the idea that Fannie Mae has changed the rules of the game and not to the benefit of my district.
In saying that, here are some of my thoughts. The LAVA FLOW HAZARD ZONE map of the Big Island was used to make this insurance determination and yet this map was not originally created for risk assessment it was for historical purposes.
Are the people who live at the base of St. Helens redlined, at well? How about the people who live on the San Andres fault? Does Fanny Mae have objections insuring these folks? Does Fanny Mae treat them differently?
This significant policy change will greatly impact the real estate market which is already heading toward a real low. Lava 1 & 2 zones are not just in my district it also includes most of Ka‘u and South Kona too. This decision is going to increase cost of affording housing. How is it that a company can come into our state and dictate who will be covered and who will be left out? If this is true perhaps they should be prohibited to write in the whole state? Insurance is a gamble and it is part of the landscape. Bowing out suddenly and with the flimsiest of excuses is not pono. I am looking to you for answers.
There has to be something we can do to get them to change there decision.
I am looking forward to your response.
Lau Lima,
Emily I. Naeole
Council Member 5th District
County Council Vice-Chair"
"December 10, 2009
The Honorable Jeffrey P. Schmidt
Insurance Commissioner
Insurance Division
P.O. Box 3614
Honolulu, Hawaii
Aloha Commissioner Schmidt,
I have become very concerned about the declining real estate market in my District. It has caused severe economic ramifications and has adversely impacted the availability of low cost housing in the Hilo area.
One of the primary causes for the above conditions is the cost of fire insurance in Lava Zones 1 and 2. Please be aware that over 50% of my district is in Lava Zones 1 and 2 with, 46% of all dwelling in Zones 1 and 2 (4479 units).
I must assume that you are aware; Hawaii Property Insurance Association (HPIA) holds the vast majority of all fire insurance policies in the Lava Zone 1 and 2 areas. With their recent 65% premium increase it has caused a severe economic impact and many times, depletes a family’s disposable income. It has also severely impacted the sales of single family dwellings in the lower Puna District. Because of the high cost of insurance, many people can not qualify for loans with the increased monthly obligation. Also I have determined that it takes 88% longer to sell a house in Zone 1 and 35% longer to sell in Zone 2 then it does to sell in Zone 3. Much of this is due to the excessively high fire insurance costs by having to use HPIA.
As a result of the above, I wish to know why HPIA rates are excessively high. As much as 3 times higher in Zones1 and 2 compared to Zone 3. As an example, for a $250,000 standard policy, the HPIA policy cost is around $2100 while in Zone 3 you can obtain a policy for around $710.
In a recent communication with one of my constituents, Terry Chambers, you mentioned that the HPIA’s rate increase filing is available for public review and that appeals can be made but that a complex actuarial study would be advisable.
I respectfully request that you send me the last 3 years of HPIA filings along with the actuarial studies that I assume you made to justify the increased premiums. If by chance you did not make an actuarial study, I would appreciate that one be made and sent to me or at least send me all the necessary data so we can have the study made for us.
Thank you for your attention to this matter and hopefully we can expect a timely response.
Lau Lima,
Emily I. Naeole-Beason
County Council vice chair.
CC: Gov. Linda Lingle
State Attorney General Mark J. Bennett
Mayor Billy Kenoi"
Lee Eisenstein
http://members.cruzio.com/~lionel/event
"Be kinder than necessary, as everyone you meet is engaged in some kind of strudel."
http://members.cruzio.com/~lionel/event
"Be kinder than necessary, as everyone you meet is engaged in some kind of strudel."