Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Native Americans allowed to sell, grow marijuana,
#1
Native Americans allowed to sell, grow marijuana, DOJ says

Native American tribes are allowed to grow and sell marijuana on their lands as long as they follow the same laws laid out for states that have legalized the drug, the U.S. Justice Department said Thursday.

The announcement could give rise to rich new business on reservations, unlike casino gambling, some advocates say. Only a handful of tribes have interest in the marijuana business.

Oregon U.S. Attorney Amanda Marshall said that the Justice Department policy addresses questions raised by tribes about how legalization of pot in states like Oregon, Washington and Colorado would apply to Indian lands.

"That's been the primary message tribes are getting to us as U.S. attorneys," Marshall said from Portland. "What will the U.S. as federal partners do to assist tribes in protecting our children and families, our tribal businesses, our tribal housing? How will you help us combat marijuana abuse in Indian Country when states are no longer there to partner with us?"

Only three tribes in California, Washington state and in the Midwest have only expressed interest in selling the drug, Marshall said. It is unclear if it will really take off the way casinos did.

One South Dakota tribe rejected a proposal to allow marijuana.

Oglala Sioux tribal Councilwoman Ellen Fills the Pipe, chairwoman of the council's Law and Order Committee, said Thursday she needs to review the federal policy more thoroughly but that given her long background in law enforcement, she opposes loosening marijuana laws.

"For me, it's a drug," Fills the Pipe said. "My gut feeling is we're most likely going to shoot it down."

In Oregon, former Klamath Tribes chairman Jeff Mitchell said communities everywhere deal with drug and alcohol issues, and tribes are likely to proceed carefully.

"I have confidence in tribal government that they will deal with it appropriately and they'll take into consideration social and legal aspects, as well as other implications that go along with bringing something like that into a community," Mitchell said.

Marshall warned that marijuana is still illegal under federal law. Problems could arise for tribes with lands in states that outlaw marijuana due to the likelihood that pot would be transported or sold outside tribal boundaries, she said.

Tribes selling marijuana may not be subject to state or local taxes allowing them to undercut off-reservation sales.

A lot of tribes are expected to consult the idea of selling marijuana.

With limited resources and vast amounts of territory to cover, federal prosecutors will not prosecute minor cases, Marshall said.

The tribal policy is based on an August 2013 Justice Department announcement that the federal government wouldn't intervene as long as legalization states tightly regulate the drug and take steps to keep it from children, criminal cartels and federal property.

U.S. attorneys also reserve the right to prosecute trafficking, firearms violations and possession of marijuana on federal property.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/12/12/nat...-doj-says/

First of all, her name is Ellen "Fills The Pipe" and she opposes this? LOL. Secondly, will this have any implications for Hawaii?
Reply
#2
will this have any implications for Hawaii?

Unless/until the Hawaiians are recognized as a sovereign nation, not likely.
Reply
#3
Correction - unless/until the Hawaiian people are recognized as a tribe. Which many do not want.
Reply
#4
........ hummm. so, even when legal in a state, pot is still not legal on any federal property within that state (and Native American lands are considered federal property), and now you report that Native Americans may be allowed to grow pot on federal property even in a state where it is not legal on non federal property.....
this sounds like a really really messy legal situation. are you sure this isn't a story from the Onion......?
Reply
#5
sounds like a really really messy legal situation

I believe that's exactly the point; there's lots of money to be made on both sides of a "gray area".

Reply
#6
quote:
Originally posted by terracore

Native Americans allowed to sell, grow marijuana, DOJ says


Heard that yesterday and gut reaction is, that's just plain nutz!. LOL

Not because I think it should be, or continue to be out-lawed. I don't, albeit I'm not a big supporter of smoking it, but I am a supporter of releasing people from our criminal justice system on the fed and state level. . I do not see any harm if somebody wants to smoke pot, no comparison to the insanity people encounter from drunks, alcohol, . and tremendous harm when criminalized.

But to make a wide open market for native Americans only?? by the feds of all there could be?? That's nutz.. It'll create a monopoly.

I agree that Native Americans should have rights on their lands, freedom to do as they see fit..

Yet limiting the rest of the US public,, by federal authority, 'monopoly', 1st gut reaction.. we ain't taking a few states with this deal, it stretches all across the US.

Florida voters over 60 killed it in the last election, but now, just hop over to one of the several reservation casinos, and smoke all ya want.

There's got to be more than meets our eyes in this story cause, it does not make sense that the feds could, or would.

"It is unclear if it will really take off the way casinos did." LOL!!

cash is king!!, it's just as clear with the casinos all over the place, it does not matter what or which moral instinct tribes have,, if there's money to be made,, it will happen.

The only sensible thing I expect is that, the feds are making the first move of removing it from their authority all across the board.

Because, there's just no way, big business, the money behind our government are going to stand for that type of national separatism..

Reply
#7
I kind of believe that there is a "catch" to all this "legalization" of growing. Get a card, you can grow. Give permission to grow in certain areas, etc.. Firearms are registered, simply for the fact the Gummit wants to know who has them, so if control is needed, they have "Zie list" to make their job "simpler" by just pre-filling warrants with registered persons name on it, and away they go collecting firearms, and without correct "I sold them" paperwork, off to jail you go.
You can figure out how the grow situation can play out if the Gummit "changes their mind due to political influence" (ie: "we need to tax this stuff!", or " big business has to run it "legally", like alcohol) on this. JMO of course.

Community begins with Aloha
Reply
#8
The US FY15 budget bill passed yesterday and it completely cuts all funding for medical cannabis criminal enforcement. This seemed to indicate funding for aerial compliance of medical cannabis grow limit violations is going to cease.

"Mahalo nui Pele, 'ae noho ia moku 'aina" - kakahiaka oli
*Japanese tourist on bus through Pahoa, "Is this still America?*
Reply
#9
The original version of the budget also lumped industrial hemp into the same category you mentioned. Do you know if the passed version also includes industrial hemp?
Reply
#10
There it is under mj. Kind of made it back being illegal in DC, bans DEA from any interference of industrial hemp production plus a whole lot of stuff in other areas.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post...t-have-to/

"Mahalo nui Pele, 'ae noho ia moku 'aina" - kakahiaka oli
*Japanese tourist on bus through Pahoa, "Is this still America?*
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)