Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
This Week At the Legislature
#1
FYI: (*Snipped - More at link)

HONOLULU — The proposed merger between Hawaiian Electric and NextEra will continue to be a focus for lawmakers. There’s a push for more oversight of the deal, and a bill moving in the House of Representatives would require the Public Utilities Commission to hold hearings about the transaction. Aside from the merger, here are three things to keep an eye on this week at the Legislature:

UNDER-SEA CABLE — The Legislature began paving the way for an interisland, high-voltage electric transmission cable several years ago. It was seen in part as a way to share the energy produced on neighbor islands with population-dense Oahu. But community members raised concerns about the idea of an under-sea cable, saying it would be costly and that it could reduce the adoption of renewable energy sources. Now lawmakers are considering a bill that would strip the Public Utilities Commission of its authority to start the process. The bill will be heard Tuesday morning in the House Committee on Energy and Environmental Protection.

ETHICS LESSONS — Whether they’re accused of not living in the districts they represent or caught using campaign funds for a personal car, lawmakers have been in the spotlight recently for some ethical conundrums. One Senate bill would require the state ethics commission to boost its ethics classes for elected officials. That bill will be heard this morning in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

POLICE OVERSIGHT — The Women’s Legislative Caucus wants police departments to post their policies on domestic violence, and the chairman of the Senate Committee on Public Safety, Intergovernmental and Military Affairs wants county mayors to be able to remove their chief of police if there’s just cause. The Senate public safety committee will hear those and other officer-conduct bills on Tuesday afternoon.

See more at: http://westhawaiitoday.com/community-bul...FzYW3.dpuf
Reply
#2
Thanks opihikao - missed this article.
(grumble grumble - why no Bill numbers westhawaiitoday.com?)

Links for the PUC related Bills mentioned (there are others as well):

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=1271&year=2015
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&billnumber=619&year=2015
Requires the PUC to apply certain standards and criteria and hold a public hearing to determine whether to approve a merger, acquisition, or consolidation of an electric utility.

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&billnumber=1468&year=2015
Removes the authorization granted to the public utilities commission to establish a regulatory structure for the installation and implementation of an interisland high-voltage electric transmission cable system by repealing chapter 269, part VIII, Hawaii Revised Statutes, and making conforming amendments.
Reply
#3
Aloha to you, ironyak, and mahalo for those links. I plan to submit testimony on several bills this session, and would hope many others will, too.

This particular session, given the HEI/NextEra "merger" (buyout) will dictate what happens with all of our future energy needs.

There are several other bills I'm watching if they survive or not, that pertain specifically to our island, and moreso, Puna. We need our community to start writing testimony at the State level, and not just at the County level.

There is a housing issue being discussed, and hopefully, it will venture out to Puna, if we get some sort of consideration. I tend to believe we are still front and center; if we choose to be. We need solid legislation, and someone to carry it all the way through.

Unfortunately, we don't have "heavy hitters" for Puna in Honolulu yet.

JMO.
Reply
#4
Over 2,800 bills submitted and passed first reading. A whole bunch of bills raising the GET but each with its own recipient of the tax proceeds. So far, no real hot button issues although with so many bills and different words with different meanings being used, hidden agendas, special interests, the finale of the sitcom series will need no laugh track to generate LOL. Bottom line, its going to get even more expensive to live in Hawaii.

"Mahalo nui Pele, 'ae noho ia moku 'aina" - kakahiaka oli
*Japanese tourist on bus through Pahoa, "Is this still America?*
Reply
#5
About 700 house bills have reached first decking, from about 1500. Even casually studying the Hawaii state government for a few years, there are still several parts of the process that remain fuzzy, like finding out what a decking is. Basically, it means the bill has passed two readings and been assigned to a committee. If that doesn't happen, the bill dies. There are two committee processes, then the bills crossover between house and senate.

There are all kinds of numbers flying around. The news said this 2015 year started with over 3000 bills, 400 less than last session. But the records show the 2014 session had almost 6,000 bills. There is a site that is keeping current status tracking. Some interesting ones are passing including multiple exemption from Jones Act. Generally, these multiple bills on one issue are consolidated in committee, the stronger bill getting modifications to incorporate the weaker versions. That is where those rewrites happen, not long before final voting.
http://openstates.org/hi/

"Mahalo nui Pele, 'ae noho ia moku 'aina" - kakahiaka oli
*Japanese tourist on bus through Pahoa, "Is this still America?*
Reply
#6
Some interesting ones are passing including multiple exemption from Jones Act.

Waste of effort; these are "automatically" pre-empted by Federal law, right?
Reply
#7
quote:
Originally posted by kalakoa

Some interesting ones are passing including multiple exemption from Jones Act.

Waste of effort; these are "automatically" pre-empted by Federal law, right?
Most of these Jones act bills are "urgings" and amount to passing a bill to send a state request to Congress. Since it is a congressional act, it will take an act of congress to change or remove it. It depends on how the final bill is crafted. Outside chance it could be an action for the state attorney general to request a variance for Hawaii because the act only applied to the states at the time of enactment in 1920. Foreign ships are allowed to dock and unload in Oahu already, why would a US competitor to Matson and Pasha be more of a national security danger, the reason being used to keep the Jones act in place.

"Mahalo nui Pele, 'ae noho ia moku 'aina" - kakahiaka oli
*Japanese tourist on bus through Pahoa, "Is this still America?*
Reply
#8
it will take an act of congress to change or remove it

Exactly: there is little chance that Congress will actually do anything subtantive.

a national security danger

Right now, Congress is failing to extend funding for Homeland Security, because the Court has yet to rule on the scope of Obama's executive authority -- why, it's almost like a national security danger, with the government arguing amongst themselves instead of taking action to protect the citizens.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)