Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
OLCA
#1
Notice to Orchidland Estates Lot Owners

On January 19, 2016 five OLCA Board members held a closed Board meeting, in violation of the Bylaws and HRS 92 Part I: Sunshine Laws and proceeded to create a new Board claiming that they had removed the President and four other Board members. The Orchidland community has to participate and be heard in a true transparent democratic process.

Please be aware of the fact that individuals elected to the office of OLCA Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer for 2015 – 2016 have attempted to destroy OLCA and the OLCA Board of Directors.

1. They have engaged in irregular voting practices and violated the Bylaws.
2. They recently improperly assessed lot owners $100 per lot for a mandatory paving assessment when in fact the Board had voted that it be a voluntary paving fee. To date they have failed to inform lot owners about this and have not refunded this money to lot owners who paid this fraudulent charge.
3. They have used unlicensed contractors to do poor quality roadwork.
4. They have held meetings excluding members of the Board and other community members.
5. They have physically attacked attendees at Board meetings.
6. They have bullied, harassed and intimidated those who have opposed their tactics.
7. The Secretary currently has sole control over the OLCA website and has removed historic archived information. He has used the site to purvey misinformation.
8. The Secretary has manipulated the minutes by excluding elements of information. He has failed fill the position of a recording secretary.
9. They have repeatedly inappropriately used OLCA funds and violated fiscal policies.
10. They have repeatedly taken actions to exclude the voice of anyone who opposes their will.
11. They are currently moving to ignore the paving plan that has been in effect since the year 2000, opening the Association to another lawsuit.
12. Orchidland Voice, a group of lot owners, has filed a suit against these individuals and other Board members.

We hope you are as concerned as we are and will attend a special membership meeting scheduled for February 27, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. at the Eagles across from the Keaau Transfer Station. For updates on OLCA, please go online to Imua Orchidland on Face Book, since only the above mentioned Secretary currently has control over the OLCA website.

Concerned Orchidland Lot Owners
Reply
#2
So ... just like HPP then?

The "fix" will have to come from outside the subdivision/associations -- and it's pretty clear that neither County nor State really care about solving the problem.
Reply
#3
Sounds like business as usual in Hawaiian Acres ,HPP and now Orchidland .
We paid our 200$ road fee as we always pay all dues and the chip seal seems better than what was there prior but the old adage " Paving their pockets and not the roads " is self evident,especially on lower Laniuma .

Mrs . Mimosa
Reply
#4
So the same group that is trying to raise funds for a competitive community lot is now making a whole new list of accusations without any proof being presented. Before they were ON (orchidland neighbors) posts last few days, and now in this new post they are "Concerned Orchidland Lot Owners." Excuse me I'm also a concerned orchidland lot owner and I am not represented in any way by this splinter group who seems to be out for blood and retaliation Somehow this does not feel quite right.
Reply
#5
Put OL into receivership, sell the community lot with proceeds going to the roads and let the competing community group build their community center? Eventually something has to give.
Reply
#6
Perhaps put OLCA in receivership and have ON raise funds / pursue grants for the community center on the lot the association already owns? Not sure it makes sense to purchase new land and undertake development under a separate organization, instead of just having receivership protect the proper running of all of OLCA's projects.

Hopefully ON could be a sucessful fundraising wing for Orchidland if the handling of the core functions and financing were more professional and reliable (receivership)


Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)