Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mayor Kim trying to ban vacation rentals.
#1
You read that right! A realtor friend called the Mayor’s office today, November 1, 2017, and received the following information from Roy Takemoto, who told her he is working on draft legislation relating to BnB’s with Kona Councilmembers Dru Kanuha and Karen Eoff. The legislation is not seeking to ban vacation rentals (his words, but actually not true if you look at the details.) Mr. Takemoto said that currently they don’t even have a first draft but this is what they are discussing:

Objective: Two-fold, to minimize the impact of BnB’s on neighborhoods while incentivising and increasing long-term affordable and middle class rentals for local residents.

Defining what “Transient Accommodations” are and how it is applied: On Maui and Oahu it is housing anyone for less than 180 days.
Regulating “hosted” rentals and/or “unhosted” rentals:
“Hosted” rentals are those where the property owner/operator lives and resides on the same land/parcel the BnB is located.
“Unhosted” would be those in which the property owner/operator lives somewhere other than the parcel that the BnB is located.
So far they are looking at leaving the “hosted” rentals alone and only applying regulations to the “unhosted.”
Any current “unhosted” rentals that are in good standing as of a cut off date, (which is not set yet), would be grandfathered in, and allowed to continue operating. Good standing, so far, is defined as having paid their transient accommodation taxes and general excise taxes. Those in good standing would be allowed to get a non-conforming certificate and continue operating.
Any new unhosted rentals would have to be in a permitted district.
Where do they permit unhosted rentals? This is the million dollar question that he says the Council will have a lot of say in. So far the administration is looking at permitting it only where hotels permitted, which is in resort, commercial zoning areas, or where the General Plan has a “designated resort node.”


He explained that along with this BnB regulation there are other strategies they are working on:
1. He also explained how the Ohana Unit option for homeowners is too strict, and they want to make them more accessible for residents to rent out.
2. He said that building standards are too strict.
3. They want to “fix” the affordable rental tax class and create a much larger tax credit to make it worth having long term rentals, and changing the requirements so the credit is more accessible to those with 2nd homes.
Reply
#2
After a vacation rental changes hands through a sale or inheritance, it would no longer qualify for,the grandfathering. In essence, all vacation rentals will be eventually be eliminated under this plan. Except for those in resort areas on the Kona side. Consider this a money grab by the hotel industry and the wealthy Kona resort owners.
Reply
#3
Seems to me, that if the county wants to promote affordable rentals...it needs to streamline the eviction process when things go wrong, first
Reply
#4
1. He also explained how the Ohana Unit option for homeowners is too strict, and they want to make them more accessible for residents to rent out.
----------
Please ask the mayor to explain that to Leilani Estates where the CCR's expressly prohibit ohanas, apartments, etc. Nothing except single-family...
Reply
#5
Any new unhosted rentals would have to be in a permitted district.

...and because most of Puna is "faux zoning", any such rental would require a Special Use Permit... which solves two problems: owner/operators would have to pay to have their SUP denied, thereby creating both revenue and a paper trail for future enforcement.

It sure would be nice to see "the rules" adjusted in a way that allows "the people" to create income and opportunity instead of having all possible benefits accrue to the government.
Reply
#6
Bullwinkle, by “streamline” I assume you mean that the County should actually provide a process for eviction. As it currently stands, once the Court issues an eviction order, it is sent to the Sheriff, who for two years, has refused to serve a single eviction order on Hawaii Island! And the police are not authorized to do this. So, no legal evictions are happening on this island unless you can somehow “convince” a tenant (or squatter) to leave on their own.
Reply
#7
the police are not authorized to do this

Hawaii County police aren't; you're perfectly welcome to fly in some off-duty officers from Maui to serve your eviction notice.
Reply
#8
Kalakoa - your statement is in error - you can have a process server present the eviction notice to the tenant, you have to bring in "outside muscle" to enforce the notice; a small but important distinction...

hotinhawaii - I think this is less of a money grab by the resort industry, than it is an effort at guaranteed employment by our resort industry unions - much like the death of the Superferry was a union sponsored effort to ensure monopoly inter-island shipping services. Unfortunately, when you have a population of voters largely disengaged from the political process, the unions own the political process...
Reply
#9
a small but important distinction...

"A distinction without a difference."
Reply
#10
This whole thing sounds a lot like "They're building a CostCo in Puna" thread.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)