05-27-2018, 05:07 AM
I posted this on another website and got much vitriol about insensitively to the Leilani displaced. Appreciate the point, but the loss of tourism is now having widespread effects to East Hawaii: jobs losses, County cost overruns, etc.
If the Leilani fountains continue for any length of time (weeks), we ought to consider this.
Pre-eruption thousands of tourists at Jaggar Museum were ooohing and aaahing at fountaining that was a small fraction of what is visible now. I was up at Jaggar on one of the better days, it was predestrian compared to the Leilani's striking fountaining.
Tightly controlled bus tours could be set up. Sanctioned by the County. 50% of revenues go to the County.
A viewing site could be set up 2 - 2 1/2 miles out, east of Nanawale. Exact site could be hashed out. Looking at a map brings up possibilities.
Access should be separate from Nanawale subdivision to avoid congestion. Is that possible? Maybe off Railroad avenue. Any dirt roads in area that would allow access?
Perhaps several sites. Perhaps one closer for tourists willing to pay more. Much more. Price range: $40 - $200 for half hour viewing.
HVNP had 5,000 visitors a day. Tourists would flock to the island to see fountaining, even from some distance. Especially at night.
- - - -
Edited to add: The term here could be disaster tourism. There is philosophical debate on the topic.
https://ethicaltraveler.org/2018/01/is-p...m-ethical/
But there is a distinction. Much disaster tourism occurs with the intent to view damaged houses, ruined neighborhoods.
Not the objective here. The objective is a spectacle of nature.
http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2017/09/02...ption.html
If the Leilani fountains continue for any length of time (weeks), we ought to consider this.
Pre-eruption thousands of tourists at Jaggar Museum were ooohing and aaahing at fountaining that was a small fraction of what is visible now. I was up at Jaggar on one of the better days, it was predestrian compared to the Leilani's striking fountaining.
Tightly controlled bus tours could be set up. Sanctioned by the County. 50% of revenues go to the County.
A viewing site could be set up 2 - 2 1/2 miles out, east of Nanawale. Exact site could be hashed out. Looking at a map brings up possibilities.
Access should be separate from Nanawale subdivision to avoid congestion. Is that possible? Maybe off Railroad avenue. Any dirt roads in area that would allow access?
Perhaps several sites. Perhaps one closer for tourists willing to pay more. Much more. Price range: $40 - $200 for half hour viewing.
HVNP had 5,000 visitors a day. Tourists would flock to the island to see fountaining, even from some distance. Especially at night.
- - - -
Edited to add: The term here could be disaster tourism. There is philosophical debate on the topic.
https://ethicaltraveler.org/2018/01/is-p...m-ethical/
But there is a distinction. Much disaster tourism occurs with the intent to view damaged houses, ruined neighborhoods.
Not the objective here. The objective is a spectacle of nature.
http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2017/09/02...ption.html