Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Restricting Driving Priviledges for the Elderly
#1
Were always talking about making our roadways safer... what about making sure our drivers are safe!

After reading stories like this, I wonder if Hawaii should restrict the age of Drivers?

....Verda Korte, 90, of Bellingham was driving a Honda Accord up Alabama Hill near Vining Street at about 3:30 p.m. when she hit Kirsten Jensen, 30, of Bellingham as Jensen rode her bicycle within two feet of the curb, according to the Bellingham Police Department.....

Korte told officers she thought she’d seen two cyclists on the road, Felmley said, adding that Korte’s depth-perception issues may have caused the crash.

Korte will be charged with second-degree negligent driving, which carries a fine of $550, Felmley said.


Should there be an age restriction on elderly drivers?

-------
The more we speak up... the more they will listen.
Reply
#2
lets start with cell phones

then IQ tests

raise the minimum driving age to 30

then go after the ederly

and my current rant ... headlamp adjustment on lifted trucks

- grin
Reply
#3
quote:
Originally posted by Bullwinkle

then go after the ederly
....
- grin


And the people who make typos [Big Grin]

-------
The more we speak up... the more they will listen.
Reply
#4
Great list Bullwinkle! Bravo and my current rant is also ... "headlamp adjustment on lifted trucks"!!!



mella l
mella l
Art and Science
bytheSEA
Reply
#5
I thought age bias was illegal. Why not base restrictions on medical disabilities and not age. Young insane people can be more dangerous than a older drivers on the road.
Always do what evers next.
Reply
#6
The problem is not the elderly. It's the fact that we can renew a license so easily. If it was a bit more restrictive then they might've caught the old gal's depth perception problem and refused her a license.

My 85 yo grandfather drives perfectly, but I wouldn't get in the car with my 82 yo grandma if my life depended on it. It's not age... it's ability.
Reply
#7
Ever drive in Europe? they require many hours of behind the wheel , the costs average a couple of thousand dollars per driver, much more like getting a pilots license in the us... theory, practice and testing. From changing a tire - yes required to pass. To zippering in merging traffic. Basic physics, "the mass of a moving object increases the square of the velocity" is taught as a fundamental concept... good to know as one blasts down the autobahn at a 100 miles per hour

given the state of our high school education , I am afraid we couldn't get a lot of the graduates over that bar






Reply
#8
I think we need to g back to some basics. When I was in school (I know.... wheels were square and fire was cold) we had to pass a government exam to graduate. We also all had to pass drivers ed AND drivers training. My school actually had a driving course, cars, etc... once we mastered the course we hit the public roads. It was all just part of learning to live in the world.

Maybe we need to revamp education... get back to QUALITY as a concept instead of quantity. I am not trying to hijack this topic. It just seems to all fit in. I had to take a drive test to get my Hawaii license (couldn't find the California one) and as I think about it, this was a good thing. Maybe we need to renew our drivers licenses every 10 years with a performance test, and every 5 years after the age of 55? Of course I am the nut who thinks that liability insurance should be paid when we register our cars too. Just seems that public interest issues should be handled more equitably. Rather like safety checks on cars. It's not a perfect system but it improves the vehicles on the road in general...

So, yes costs would be more but what is our community safety worth?

Just another day in P A R A D I S E !!
I want to be the kind of woman that, when my feet
hit the floor each morning, the devil says

"Oh Crap, She's up!"
Reply
#9
quote:
Originally posted by Bullwinkle

Basic physics, "the mass of a moving object increases the square of the velocity" is taught as a fundamental concept...


Not in this universe!
Reply
#10
"Not in this universe!"

going on high speed we should consider, that the energy needed to accelerate the car quadruples with a doubling of the velocity and also the air drag quadruples with double velocity. Therefore, a car cruising on a highway at 50 mph (80 km/h) may require only 10 horsepower (7 kW) to overcome air drag, but that same car at 100 mph (160 km/h) requires 80 hp (60 kW). Twice the speed requires eight times the power.


from the German "handbook" sorry for the oversimplification


and this from one of my old texts - I just had to look it up -

K.E.= 0.5*m*v*v

m is the mass of the object
v is the velocity of the object
KE varies as the square with velocity and directly proportional to mass of the object
So if velocity is increased by 10 times, KE is increased by 100 (10*10) times.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)