06-24-2009, 01:55 AM
Mayor Kenoi will be available today (Wednesday) from noon to 1 pm to take questions from the public on a Blog called the Hot Seat at the Honolulu Advertiser.
Here's the link: http://hotseat.honadvblogs.com/
I've already submitted two questions to him. I hope the moderator uses them. I look forward to some answers. Tiffany Hunt has a raft of questions posted too.
My questions are:
#7 Rob:
June 23rd, 2009 at 7:42 pm
The Puna Community Development Plan became law last summer and required you to name nine members to the Action Committee. Thirty six people applied and interviewed by the Planning Department last December. You have now had seven months in office and have failed to appoint this important committee as required by law.
Why?
#8 Rob:
June 23rd, 2009 at 7:51 pm
Regarding the divestiture of the 2% Land Preservation Fund:
It was suggested to you prior to passage of Bill 49 that the county treat the 2% Land Preservation Fund as a loan, to be paid back to the fund in better economic times. You ignored that proposal. It would have respected the intentions of the voters and met your short term budget needs. Why would that have not been a reasonable approach to acquiring the money from that dedicated fund?
Here's the link: http://hotseat.honadvblogs.com/
I've already submitted two questions to him. I hope the moderator uses them. I look forward to some answers. Tiffany Hunt has a raft of questions posted too.
My questions are:
#7 Rob:
June 23rd, 2009 at 7:42 pm
The Puna Community Development Plan became law last summer and required you to name nine members to the Action Committee. Thirty six people applied and interviewed by the Planning Department last December. You have now had seven months in office and have failed to appoint this important committee as required by law.
Why?
#8 Rob:
June 23rd, 2009 at 7:51 pm
Regarding the divestiture of the 2% Land Preservation Fund:
It was suggested to you prior to passage of Bill 49 that the county treat the 2% Land Preservation Fund as a loan, to be paid back to the fund in better economic times. You ignored that proposal. It would have respected the intentions of the voters and met your short term budget needs. Why would that have not been a reasonable approach to acquiring the money from that dedicated fund?
Assume the best and ask questions.
Punaweb moderator
Punaweb moderator