Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How to deal with a squatter
#1
You guys collectively have a lot of good information on situations like this ...
Request in advance, no solutions that involve threats, violence, brandishing firearms.

An old friend of both my sons, from Northern California, has been working on a small cabin in HOVE over the last decade. He comes here for three months of the winter every year and stays in it. In recent years he's been working on upgrading it to a real livable space rather than one step up from camping.

However, last year he got ripped off in a big way; all sorts of valuable materials and tools were stolen, which isn't that surprising. We have a mutual friend who goes way back as a friend and lives in HOVE year round. He tries to help but doesn't always make the best judgment calls. He found some guy who needed a place and encouraged him to stay at the cabin so it wouldn't get ripped off.

When our friend in California sent the word to make sure he was gone because he, the owner, was coming for his winter stay, the guy only moved to a different area of the property and is trying to assert some kind of squatter's rights or right to be there by permission. Not sure of his exact legal theory as I haven't talked to our friend since he got down to the property and the guy flat out refused to vacate.

Our friend never made a rental or caretaker's agreement with the squatter. No money has changed hands. No papers were signed. He never met or spoke to the guy before this week. It was all done through the mutual friend, who is now on major sh*tlist with his friend for creating this situation.

Apparently he (friend who lives here) thought the guy was an OK person to watch over things, but there is a girlfriend (the squatter's) who is schizophrenic and generally a wild card in the picture, which makes it all extra undesirable and difficult.

Anyhow, cops were called and refused to help remove the guy.
One of my sons suggested calling sheriff instead of regular police, but isn't that to enforce a court order like an ejectment? I've never been involved with anything like this.

Any advice on how to get rid of the guy would be welcome.

PS. I have read some Hawai'i cases on adverse possession in the past, and the statute is 20 years, plus "under color of right" to title is one of the required elements. So no way has this guy acquired any kind of permanent legal rights over the land by squatting.
Reply
#2
Kathy, maybe a temporary restraining order would help. Not too expensive.
Reply
#3
I agree the squatter, isn't even considered a "squatter" yet, not enough time has passed. I wonder why the police wouldn't help. I'm also thinking the he would need to go start an eviction process, since he did allow the person on the premesis. I think there is something about knowingly allowing him to live there being considered verbal agreement, or an acknowledged agreement, which can hold weight. The restraining order may be too soon if they are not threatening him, but probably would need to happen at some point. Anyway, them's my two cents. Sheriff's deputy can serve all those papers.

Enjoy the day! Ann

Back to blogging at
http://crazypineappledream.blogspot.com
Enjoy the day! Ann
Reply
#4
If it was Florida, which it ain't, he would need to do a legal eviction. There is enough to suggest that the person was legally residing there. The S.O., P.D. or Courthouse probably has a packet to get an eviction started. Whoever does civil, probably S.O., would be who to ask for the proper procedure. It's going to be a pain in the asz and the quicker started the quicker it will be finished.

Pua`a
S. FL
Big Islander to be.
Pua`a
S. FL
Big Islander to be.
Reply
#5
quote:
Originally posted by KathyH
PS. I have read some Hawai'i cases on adverse possession in the past, and the statute is 20 years, plus "under color of right" to title is one of the required elements. So no way has this guy acquired any kind of permanent legal rights over the land by squatting.
The requirements for adverse possession are: 1. Hostile, 2. Open & Notorious, 3. Exclusive, 4. Continuous, 5. Claim of Right. You are correct about the time requirement. In addition, properties recorded in Land Court are protected from Adverse Possession. The guy has no right. He should be arrested for trespassing.

Aloha,
John S. Rabi, GM,PB,ABR,CRB,CM,FHS
808.327.3185
johnrabi@johnrabi.com
http://www.JohnRabi.com
Typically Tropical Properties
"The Next Level of Service!"
This is what I think of the Kona Board of Realtors: http://www.nsm88.org/aboutus.html

Reply
#6
Sounds like eviction or pay him to leave.

He was there with permission, to watch over the place, so there is no trespass, there was "consideration" (caretaking). He needs to be dealt with as a tennant. IMHO.

Dan
Reply
#7
quote:
Originally posted by DanielP

He was there with permission, to watch over the place, so there is no trespass, there was "consideration" (caretaking).
Ding, Ding, Ding...
...Give the man a prize
[^]
Reply
#8
Kathy, I think the owner is the one who has to file Simple Trespass charges. The friend, unless the owner has given him POA to act on his behalf, is not the owner. The person on the property could always claim that the "friend" and "owner" gave permission, so it's up to the owner to counter that the "friend" had no licncese to grant permission to be on the property and that as "owner" they also gave no such license.

Since their is a cloud over if the person was granted a license to be on the property, the police hands are tied because it becomes a civil landlord tenant issue. Without the owner present or a POA to dispute the statement of the person on the property, there is a unanswered question about what license (if any) the person had to be on the property.
Reply
#9
Have the owner call the Police main office and ask them why they are not taking action on an owner’s complaint of a trespasser. If the answer is not to their satisfaction, ask for the next person in command higher up. Keep doing that until someone provides a valid answer. There could be a legitimate legal reason the Police hands are tied, but the owner needs someone to quote them exactly what that is, otherwise, the owner has a legitimate expectation of police action when a crime is reported.

Ohhh, In reading Daniels post below, and rereading your post, you said the owner gave the friend a POA. So the friend was legally acting on behalf of the owner when he made a deal with the 'squatter' and gave license to be on the property. That may make it a landlord tenant issue to the police until a court says otherwise. Although the law does keep referencing the agreement, so it may just be a matter of getting the court to state that no agreement exist as a landlord tenant so there is no landlord tenant issue. Or they may say to treat it as terminanting a month to month agreement.
Reply
#10
It sounds clear that the "squatter" was originally there with the owner's knowledge and consent. It only became an issue later. I think that I still get the "Ding, Ding, Ding"

Pay him to leave ASAP.

Dan
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)