Sen Ruderman, where is the proof

[Permie]

All good scientists will post a conclusion like this when research needs additional confirmation:

quote:

---

These findings support the hypothesis that organophosphate exposure, at levels common among US children, may contribute to ADHD prevalence. Prospective studies are needed to establish whether this association is causal.

---

The problem is, some then use such statements to mean they have no merit. What they mean is that more research needs to be done to confirm (or not) preliminary findings. Conversely, bad scientists test their compounds in a dozen rats and a couple goats, none die, so they call it safe. And for whatever reason, the same people that tend to find the studies I post as having no merit, take those manufacturers at their word.