Sen Ruderman, where is the proof

[Midnight Rambler]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Russell

The Seralini study intentionally used the same protocol as in Monsanto's previous study. The criticism of the sample size being small is not proof of an incorrect study. It simply calls for a larger study. The story illuminates the extent to which the GMO industry goes to hide the facts, for as long as it's possible. Those who cite the study as pro-GMO evidence will have lots of egg on their face. I hope for their sake it's non-GMO.

---

So you're arguing that because Monsanto did a largely worthless study, we should accept Seralini's worthless study because it contradicts theirs? Seriously?