02-02-2014, 07:28 AM
@ HC
The court minutes clearly show the Prosecutor made statements to the court, which we now know, are not even reasonably related to the facts.
The key here being that "which we now know" is not relevant to what the Prosecutor knew at "that" time. Only he could tell us why he made the statement he did, then. However it apparently was reasonable to the Judge, that's why he granted to motion, and cannot be termed a "lie", no sir! For people to slander the prosecutor, without his/her knowledge or opportunity to respond is not right, and if need be, I will defend.
A lie vs misinformation is a long distance apart! Everyday lawyers in court make statements to this same context, do you think they are held contempt, but to call them liars is what's really problematic!
The court minutes clearly show the Prosecutor made statements to the court, which we now know, are not even reasonably related to the facts.
The key here being that "which we now know" is not relevant to what the Prosecutor knew at "that" time. Only he could tell us why he made the statement he did, then. However it apparently was reasonable to the Judge, that's why he granted to motion, and cannot be termed a "lie", no sir! For people to slander the prosecutor, without his/her knowledge or opportunity to respond is not right, and if need be, I will defend.
A lie vs misinformation is a long distance apart! Everyday lawyers in court make statements to this same context, do you think they are held contempt, but to call them liars is what's really problematic!