10-26-2014, 05:47 PM
First let's start by giving Criminal Investigative Section "Captain"(Robert) Wagner his due rank!
Then let's try to put this into perspective: Why would an individual(s), who reported allegations of a crime, write statements in public forums that basically state "wait till is all comes out" and then elude to having to wait for permission from the police to provide further public information, when as stated, the information given to the police comes from the public domain to begin with!
Does that sound right to you?
I have no "bones to pick" here on any side(s). But I do offer an observation/suggestion.
Some like to boast about what they know, or think they know, then capture the interest of others by stating how serious this issue is. Instead of letting the process run it course, their lack of patience gets the better of them and get offended when others challenge their individual belief that a crime has been committed and the individual they identified committed it, instead of remaining vigilant and silent until authorities make it publicly known one way or another. Reasons complainant's do this is they want others to know that they were the one(s) to bring the allegations forward. In other words, its all about them! At times they forget the very reason they brought it forward to begin with and want to tell others their opinions such as how Det. Grant Todd is a very good officer, why they identify the investigating officer at all, proves my point that the issue(S) is really about themselves.
Think about it, until an individual is charged, and later convicted, most of this discussion is self-serving!
Then let's try to put this into perspective: Why would an individual(s), who reported allegations of a crime, write statements in public forums that basically state "wait till is all comes out" and then elude to having to wait for permission from the police to provide further public information, when as stated, the information given to the police comes from the public domain to begin with!
Does that sound right to you?
I have no "bones to pick" here on any side(s). But I do offer an observation/suggestion.
Some like to boast about what they know, or think they know, then capture the interest of others by stating how serious this issue is. Instead of letting the process run it course, their lack of patience gets the better of them and get offended when others challenge their individual belief that a crime has been committed and the individual they identified committed it, instead of remaining vigilant and silent until authorities make it publicly known one way or another. Reasons complainant's do this is they want others to know that they were the one(s) to bring the allegations forward. In other words, its all about them! At times they forget the very reason they brought it forward to begin with and want to tell others their opinions such as how Det. Grant Todd is a very good officer, why they identify the investigating officer at all, proves my point that the issue(S) is really about themselves.
Think about it, until an individual is charged, and later convicted, most of this discussion is self-serving!