04-23-2015, 03:40 PM
Pretty strange that the smithsonian mag article references toms personal blog not to mention a number of other bizarre sources.
I wouldn't expect to see such biased opinion coming out of the smitsonian.
I wouldn't be surprised if that article is retracted. The writer is certainly entitled to his opinions but using the smitsonian name as a platform seems incorrect to me somehow - almost tarnishing their good name - to show my own inherent bias.
I wouldn't expect to see such biased opinion coming out of the smitsonian.
I wouldn't be surprised if that article is retracted. The writer is certainly entitled to his opinions but using the smitsonian name as a platform seems incorrect to me somehow - almost tarnishing their good name - to show my own inherent bias.