11-09-2009, 07:33 AM
NOW that the POLES are in alignment (opposites attract) can we get back to the topic.
There have been some interesting comments in between the "Polar Shifts".
In the news article Tax Squad - in the upper left hand corner are PDF files - READ THEM - then hang onto your hat - lost mine reading this:
"A fine for selling, offering to sell, or otherwise conveying more than one price for
any business to be transacted when the lower price is offered if the transaction is
paid for in cash, unless there is a legitimate business purpose for the separate
prices. The fine may not exceed $3,000 for cash-based businesses, and may not
exceed $2,000 for all other persons."
So if a person running a legitimate business does not want to pay - let's say credit card fees - it is "Illegal" for him to say - I can give you a "discount for cash"! [?]
They put in a disclaimer "unless there is a legitimate business purpose for the separate
prices" - who decides - the newbie just hired to enforce "Act 134"? [?]
They do not define cash as "CASH" - dollar bills, coin - but also as "note" which covers writing a check!
How did this get thru the "Legislative Process" and SIGNED - without a STINK being raised? [?]
There have been some interesting comments in between the "Polar Shifts".
In the news article Tax Squad - in the upper left hand corner are PDF files - READ THEM - then hang onto your hat - lost mine reading this:
"A fine for selling, offering to sell, or otherwise conveying more than one price for
any business to be transacted when the lower price is offered if the transaction is
paid for in cash, unless there is a legitimate business purpose for the separate
prices. The fine may not exceed $3,000 for cash-based businesses, and may not
exceed $2,000 for all other persons."
So if a person running a legitimate business does not want to pay - let's say credit card fees - it is "Illegal" for him to say - I can give you a "discount for cash"! [?]
They put in a disclaimer "unless there is a legitimate business purpose for the separate
prices" - who decides - the newbie just hired to enforce "Act 134"? [?]
They do not define cash as "CASH" - dollar bills, coin - but also as "note" which covers writing a check!
How did this get thru the "Legislative Process" and SIGNED - without a STINK being raised? [?]