04-02-2013, 03:47 PM
I do forget that many here do not have the background & may not understand some of the issues....
The EPA CWA is the main reason this is an issue....along with HOW this state developed their CWA compliance....
The state did visual impaired waters determination throughout the islands..NO TESTING WAS DONE ON MOST, but the EPA does require that impaired waters have an improvement plan that will address the impairment.
Many communities established water quality advisory boards to address the issues. This island had quite a few water advisory boards when we moved, & we were a part of the process...
from these community advisory groups, recommendations arose, including the strengthening of the grubbing & grading permits & such... but there was no additional funds to test for impaired waters that were listed, and a mandate to produce clean water regulations.
This island has been fortunate to have gotten some funding (public & private) and university assistance in water quality testing in many of this islands listed impaired waters to augment the testing that was done... some results are below.
Based on the initial testing, most of the state & county advisory groups advised increasing the level of required residential waste water treatment (industrial & multi unit gang cesspools were outlawed by the EPA & were SUPPOSED to be converted by 2005, but there still are non-compliances on those!). throughout the state, and that includes on this island, that recommendation was met with a lot of resistance
it may show that with a few more years time to think about, some of the people on this thread may now be in favor of upgrading the way wastewater is handled here.... but there is still a hesitance to pay for the testing for this issue,k and so I am sure that the majority would not be in favor of a wastewater compliance change...yet.....testing is needed to positively ID the sources (this has not been widely done in most of the state counties... there have been a few tests... but most have only had indicator presences, nothing definitive... perhaps if that existed, the cesspools would not!
State wide testing data:
http://emdweb.doh.hawaii.gov/cwb/wqd/vie...)/Map.aspx
http://www.nrdc.org/water/oceans/ttw/sumhaw.pdf
Not positive which preliminary test are being referred to that the tide pools DON'T have residential waste indicators, might be a good idea to link that test, but here are links to research that show the opposite:
http://hilo.hawaii.edu/academics/hohonu/...uality.pdf
Some of the PUNA funding needs for wastewater issues:
http://hawaii.gov/dlnr/occl/manuals-repo...0Final.pdf
http://kapohobeachlots.info/minutes/20120818Minutes.pdf
The EPA CWA is the main reason this is an issue....along with HOW this state developed their CWA compliance....
The state did visual impaired waters determination throughout the islands..NO TESTING WAS DONE ON MOST, but the EPA does require that impaired waters have an improvement plan that will address the impairment.
Many communities established water quality advisory boards to address the issues. This island had quite a few water advisory boards when we moved, & we were a part of the process...
from these community advisory groups, recommendations arose, including the strengthening of the grubbing & grading permits & such... but there was no additional funds to test for impaired waters that were listed, and a mandate to produce clean water regulations.
This island has been fortunate to have gotten some funding (public & private) and university assistance in water quality testing in many of this islands listed impaired waters to augment the testing that was done... some results are below.
Based on the initial testing, most of the state & county advisory groups advised increasing the level of required residential waste water treatment (industrial & multi unit gang cesspools were outlawed by the EPA & were SUPPOSED to be converted by 2005, but there still are non-compliances on those!). throughout the state, and that includes on this island, that recommendation was met with a lot of resistance
it may show that with a few more years time to think about, some of the people on this thread may now be in favor of upgrading the way wastewater is handled here.... but there is still a hesitance to pay for the testing for this issue,k and so I am sure that the majority would not be in favor of a wastewater compliance change...yet.....testing is needed to positively ID the sources (this has not been widely done in most of the state counties... there have been a few tests... but most have only had indicator presences, nothing definitive... perhaps if that existed, the cesspools would not!
State wide testing data:
http://emdweb.doh.hawaii.gov/cwb/wqd/vie...)/Map.aspx
http://www.nrdc.org/water/oceans/ttw/sumhaw.pdf
Not positive which preliminary test are being referred to that the tide pools DON'T have residential waste indicators, might be a good idea to link that test, but here are links to research that show the opposite:
http://hilo.hawaii.edu/academics/hohonu/...uality.pdf
Some of the PUNA funding needs for wastewater issues:
http://hawaii.gov/dlnr/occl/manuals-repo...0Final.pdf
http://kapohobeachlots.info/minutes/20120818Minutes.pdf