07-10-2010, 12:12 PM
Chris, I'm totally with you on this.
I think the Census worker made some pretty big assumptions too:
1) erroneously assumed chris DIDN'T get the questionnaire and therefore felt entitled to trespass just to make sure (why not make appt. by phone, or just yell from the gate?)
2) erroneously assumed that someone back at their own Census Bureau office properly input their response (or they just didn't know or care to find out?), and acted accordingly
3) They assumed it's okay to trespass without warning, under any conditions, even just to correct their own errors or lack of information, etc.
I'm all for the Census, did mine right away. But this intrusive approach disturbs me; it violates common sense. Even my friends ask permission to come through my gate (even though they don't have to). It's about common courtesy and respecting people's privacy. If the Census worker calls me out to the gate I'm happy to walk out and talk story, get the form, fill it out, maybe even share a bottle of cold water or tea. I am always cooperative and respectful when people respect my fence and gate.
Here's an interesting scenario a friend came up with: what happens when a Census worker enters someone's property, goes past "no trespassing" and "beware of dog" signs, through a closed gate, then gets attacked by a 200-pound rottweiler while the owner is in town shopping? Who is morally responsible? Who is legally liable? The owner of the lot or the Census worker who trespassed under the authority of the Census Bureau?
Don't know the answer, but it's something to think about.
(Edited for too many typos to count)
I think the Census worker made some pretty big assumptions too:
1) erroneously assumed chris DIDN'T get the questionnaire and therefore felt entitled to trespass just to make sure (why not make appt. by phone, or just yell from the gate?)
2) erroneously assumed that someone back at their own Census Bureau office properly input their response (or they just didn't know or care to find out?), and acted accordingly
3) They assumed it's okay to trespass without warning, under any conditions, even just to correct their own errors or lack of information, etc.
I'm all for the Census, did mine right away. But this intrusive approach disturbs me; it violates common sense. Even my friends ask permission to come through my gate (even though they don't have to). It's about common courtesy and respecting people's privacy. If the Census worker calls me out to the gate I'm happy to walk out and talk story, get the form, fill it out, maybe even share a bottle of cold water or tea. I am always cooperative and respectful when people respect my fence and gate.
Here's an interesting scenario a friend came up with: what happens when a Census worker enters someone's property, goes past "no trespassing" and "beware of dog" signs, through a closed gate, then gets attacked by a 200-pound rottweiler while the owner is in town shopping? Who is morally responsible? Who is legally liable? The owner of the lot or the Census worker who trespassed under the authority of the Census Bureau?
Don't know the answer, but it's something to think about.
(Edited for too many typos to count)
Tim
A superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions--Confucius
A superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions--Confucius