01-20-2015, 05:46 AM
The Iceland plant isn't pumping magma out of the ground and they wouldn't be doing so here, either.-leilanidude
Enhanced Geothermal system (EGS) is what PGV uses presently, I never used the word "pumping". Our laws only cover EGS. I have checked and they have not amended the language yet. If they plan to go for a MAGMA enhanced geothermal system they will have to change the language.
The described process of ESG is to create a well and inject water and chemical substances into it to make energy. That is why it is called "enhanced". It is not just water. They use this "brine" of water and chemicals, over and over again, storing it in the ponds for future use. That is why they have these ponds in the back. Everyone has seen the ponds, haven't they?
So I ask you today, why would Ormat want to continue to use EGS if they have the opportunity to develop a magma enhanced geothermal system? It would offer so many financial incentives especially when there is already one up and running in Iceland that just came on board in 2015. Why wouldn't Ormat eventually ask to do the same thing esp. when it is more economical to use magma as the heat source instead of rocks?
Yet they are going to have to ask to amend the language of the law in order to this. This will take lawyers and legislators. Hence the choice of our new attorney general. []
Throwing anything on magma is scientifically and spiritually a no no in my book. It is like opening up the Pandora's box and a profound disrespect to Madame PELE.
Edited for punctuation
Enhanced Geothermal system (EGS) is what PGV uses presently, I never used the word "pumping". Our laws only cover EGS. I have checked and they have not amended the language yet. If they plan to go for a MAGMA enhanced geothermal system they will have to change the language.
The described process of ESG is to create a well and inject water and chemical substances into it to make energy. That is why it is called "enhanced". It is not just water. They use this "brine" of water and chemicals, over and over again, storing it in the ponds for future use. That is why they have these ponds in the back. Everyone has seen the ponds, haven't they?
So I ask you today, why would Ormat want to continue to use EGS if they have the opportunity to develop a magma enhanced geothermal system? It would offer so many financial incentives especially when there is already one up and running in Iceland that just came on board in 2015. Why wouldn't Ormat eventually ask to do the same thing esp. when it is more economical to use magma as the heat source instead of rocks?
Yet they are going to have to ask to amend the language of the law in order to this. This will take lawyers and legislators. Hence the choice of our new attorney general. []
Throwing anything on magma is scientifically and spiritually a no no in my book. It is like opening up the Pandora's box and a profound disrespect to Madame PELE.
Edited for punctuation