Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
HPP BIZ: Part the second
quote:
Originally posted by Obie

It looks like their business registration expired but it was after the contract was approved.


Is that what your spouse Creelley told you?
Got some proof?
Reply
Paving crew was showing wear bars on the right rear tire, indicating that the tire had worn to the minimum 1/16-inch tread depth. Clearly unsafe and possibly illegal, someone needs to revoke that contract right now, because I demand accountability, and rules are for everyone.
Reply
quote:
Originally posted by Obie

It looks like their business registration expired but it was after the contract was approved.

The contractor's license is still valid :

https://pvl.ehawaii.gov/pvlsearch/info/CT-33614-0

Bottom line is a road that needed to be paved, was paved.

I bet the people living on Beach are glad to have some noise and pressure taken off their road.


Thank you for pointing that out. I wasn’t really sure.
So, is the road officially open yet?

Puna: Our roosters crow first
Puna: Our roosters crow first
Reply
So, is the road officially open yet?

Unofficially open.
It’s mostly finished & there’s not a Local Traffic Only sign in place as last week.
"I'm at that stage in life where I stay out of discussions. Even if you say 1+1=5, you're right - have fun." - Keanu Reeves
Reply
Aloha,

We know it's been difficult for members not having information about plaintiff, Larry Kawaauhau's lawsuit and HPP business for over four months now. We have an update for HPP members that was authorized by HPP's legal counsel. We apologize for communicating with you via social media. We would've preferred to use the HPP website but it's unavailable to us. This is just for your information and we apologize that we are unable to take any questions at this time.

1) Employees aren't authorized to act as spokespersons for HPP regarding lawsuits. From 21 Jun 2019 the GM, Don Morris, and office staff relayed false information to D5 director and to the HPP community that there was NO board after the mass board resignations of five. The GM was informed 21 Jun that the HPP bylaws and 414D Hawaii Revised Statutes state the remaining board of three is a legal board who can conduct business.

2) There's been NO LEGAL process thus far in which Craig Crelly could be considered a seated director. The only sure thing about the board make up at this point in time is that there are three directors. When Crelly resigned on 19 Jun, he resigned his director and secretary seat, therefore the info currently posted on the HPP website is false and wasn't approved by the board.

Larry Kawaauhau, District 1 director, filed a lawsuit on 12 July 2019 against the Association and two directors. He has been uncooperative with the two directors since the mass resignations occurred. HPP has an attorney representing HPP and the directors. The GM, and former director Crelly, are supportive of Kawaauhau's lawsuit against HPPOA and the two directors, and they are very involved in the lawsuit. Kawaauhau wasn't/isn't legally authorized to cancel ANY Association meeting, yet has canceled four board meetings and the 27 Oct 2019 membership meeting to date. This action has blocked the existing legitimate board of three from conducting any HPP business for four months. Two of the three directors has been shut out of all HPP business. The GM is suing a director so this is another lawsuit affecting HPP business.

Kawaauhau and the GM are acting independently and are NOT authorized to control the HPP website, conduct business for HPP or spend Association monies that are beyond day to day business...i.e. employee salaries, monthly bills etc. They are in violation of Article VIII Sec 12 Acts of the Board. i.e. There is NO contract between HPP and the contractor working on 1st Rd and there was NO board authorization to expend monies to the contractor for the road paving project. On 1 Jul 2019 Dist 5 and 7 directors asked the GM to see the paving contract, the GM replied that there was no contract. Therefore, the road paving work had no board authorization.

There has been two phone hearings in which the judge declined the plaintiff's request for receivership. There was a court hearing for the partial summary judgment regarding Crelly's resignation and the court has yet to determine whether he's a director. There will be an evidentiary hearing coming up in the near future in which a judge will determine Crelly's resignation, and in the meantime Craig Crelly's director seat is in limbo. Crelly claims he resigned on 19 Jun 2019 in solidarity with the other 4 directors who resigned.

The judge and the attorneys for plaintiff and defendants recently agreed that a trustee will be assigned soon, chosen by the judge, to manage HPP business. This is a positive thing for HPP as this will put an end to the era of a few people managing HPP without legal authorization.

Mahalo for your patience,

District 5 and 7 Directors
Reply
A very small percentage of the owners are going to see this here. This thing needs to be in the news paper, at least.
Reply
My road is crap and has been for four months. I keep putting requests in, it is so bad that I no longer drive my small car. It was so much better when we had the old road crew, I never even had to put a request in.
Reply
Fyi, please take what is said here, with a grain of mistrust. Heres a board member that has neen shown to be hostile to all in hppoa except her friend on the board. Mermaids pissed, cause the take over by her and friend were thwarted. Sorry but shes a snake.

She kicked me off the board member picking group comittee. WHY? Because we had only one thing to do as a nominating committee. That was to try to find persons interested in being a board member. How did she kick me off?. How about a full on argument, on emails between her ,leo, and Bruce. Thats how she does it.

At our only authorised meeting ,we appvoted to NOT TO ,DISCUSS OR COMENT ABOUT WHAT WE WERE DOING, EXCEPT IN THAT MEETING, NOT EVER BY EMAIL. RIGHT AWAY SHE VIOLATED THIS. All commitee members voted to this. Next day shes bashing leo and sends it all of us on email.I say this must stop, her and bruce continue like i didnt say a thing.
U see she was ok with this. We were just simpletons on HER comittee, cause she was a hi and mighty BOARD MEMBER. How did she get to be one ? Research it.

She was being racisit. Prove u say? I have all the emails. Wanna see em? I bet Mermaid doesnt want u to.

Her agenda is to do what only she wants. She must control the entire board to further her agenda. She thought she had that , when the board desolved,leavimg her and friend in charge ,she hoped.

According to hppoa, craig was okd by the Judge, so whos lying?

Dont expect opinions expressed here to be fact. Perhaps others here will tell us.

Please dont trust my word, ck it out.

HPPOA is mesed up. U wanna fix it ? Dont be affraid of the past.

We need to all do our best for this place we call home., Dont let persons further there own agenda.

When we have 20 K persons here we can incorperate, than it would have a huge impact on hppoa, for the better i hope.

Thanks for reading.
Aloha
Dan

Ps, Hi mermaid, (Maylinn) You thought i would just lay down and go away didnt u? Ha.
If i was u i would not have said those racist thing on an open email hm?

Bet we wont hear from her for awhile, shes gotta regroup.
Or expect a schathing reply. I can back my words up. Can she?
Aloha 2


HPP

HPP
Reply
Here are the minutes of the only time this has gone before a judge.After the motions were denied by the judge,Mermaid had her attorney refile the same motions. She apparently doesn't realize that every time she even talks to the attorney it costs HPPOA money.The judge ruled and stated his reasons.

Minutes
CONVENED AT 8:38 A.M.; RECORDER: FTR 3E APPEARANCES: P. HAMANO, ATTY/PLTF T. REVERE, ATTY/DEFT . CRT: NOTED THE CROSS MOTION FILED BY MR. HAMANO; . AT 8:39 A.M. ARGUMENTS: REVERE UNTIL 8:40 A.M. HAMANO UNTIL 8:47 A.M. REVERE REBUTTAL UNTIL 8:47 A.M. . CRT: STATED THE BASIS FOR HIS DECISION; DENIED MOTION; . RECESS AT 8:48 A.M. . RECONVENED AT 9:07 AM W/THE SAME PARTIES PRESENT; . CRT: NOTED IT HAD A DISCUSSION W/COUNSELS IN CHAMBERS; INSTRUCTED COUNSELS TO CONFER W/THEIR RESPECTIVE CLIENTS; SHOULD THERE BE NO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THE CRT WILL ORDER PARTIES TOMEDIATION; STRONGLY SUGGESTED WHEN PARTIES MEET, TO HAVE A NEUTRAL FACILITATOR PRESENT; . STATUS CONFERENCE SET ON OCTOBER 23, 2019 AT 7:50 A.M. W/MR. REVERE TO ARRANGE THE TELECONFERENCE; . RECESS .
Reply
The "judge" ruled in the sense that he didn't want to work too hard before his imminent retirement. As the great President Leopoldo Galtieri said during the Falklands War, "The battle continues."

P.S. I've seen the mermaid's committee work and can testify she has no selfish motives but works for what she believes is the best for HPP.

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 36 Guest(s)